They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires

Abstract Brands are under increasing pressure to champion customer diversity, equity, and inclusion, but do customers always appreciate such efforts? Drawing on identity literature, we investigate when customer diversity initiatives (CDIs) backfire and propose strategies to mitigate this. Our research reveals that CDIs targeting a dissociative group more permanently evokes higher levels of brand distancing behaviors among existing customers compared to temporary efforts. This effect is driven by identity signaling threat and perceived betrayal. Aligning the duration of CDI with customers’ relationship types can help mitigate these negative reactions for sincere brands. Moreover, a sub-brand or product customization strategy reduces customers’ identity signaling threat toward a dissociative CDI, whilst highlighting the brand’s pro-social goals partially mitigates threat perceptions for sincere brands. Our findings offer critical insights for managers on promoting diversity without alienating existing customers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01105-5
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires

Louise M. Hassan, Miriam McGowan, Edward Shiu
7 citations
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
14.51
article

They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires

Louise M. Hassan, Miriam McGowan, Edward Shiu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Brands are under increasing pressure to champion customer diversity, equity, and inclusion, but do customers always appreciate such efforts? Drawing on identity literature, we investigate when customer diversity initiatives (CDIs) backfire and propose strategies to mitigate this. Our research reveals that CDIs targeting a dissociative group more permanently evokes higher levels of brand distancing behaviors among existing customers compared to temporary efforts. This effect is driven by identity signaling threat and perceived betrayal. Aligning the duration of CDI with customers’ relationship types can help mitigate these negative reactions for sincere brands. Moreover, a sub-brand or product customization strategy reduces customers’ identity signaling threat toward a dissociative CDI, whilst highlighting the brand’s pro-social goals partially mitigates threat perceptions for sincere brands. Our findings offer critical insights for managers on promoting diversity without alienating existing customers.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceVol. 53(2)
Bangor University (GB), Durham University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
14.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires — Louise M. Hassan, Miriam McGowan, et al. · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS