Research on the Enforcement Mechanism of Settlement Agreements in China under the <i>Singapore Convention on </i><i>Mediation</i>

《新加坡调解公约》建立了国际和解协议跨国直接执行机制，促进了国际商事争议解决的发展。但是《新加坡调解公约》中的和解协议直接执行制度与国内调解协议获得执行的制度差距过大；我国商事调解立法的严重缺位；我国有关虚假调解的法律规制不完善，导致《新加坡调解公约》难以和国内法进行衔接。我国向来重视调解的争端解决方式，应积极探索如何与《新加坡调解公约》进行制度衔接，完善中国的国际商事争议解决机制，促进我国的国际经贸发展。The Singapore Convention on Mediation establishes a cross-border direct enforcement mechanism for international settlement agreements, advancing international commercial dispute resolution. However, the Singapore Convention on Mediation faces challenges in aligning with China’s domestic legal framework due to significant gaps between its direct enforcement regime and China’s domestic mediation enforcement mechanisms, insufficient commercial mediation legislation, and inadequate legal regulations against fraudulent mediation. China, which has long prioritized mediation as a key dispute resolution approach, should proactively explore institutional alignment with the Singapore Convention on Mediation to enhance its international commercial dispute resolution system and promote international trade and economic development.