Patient-specific instrumentation in primary total shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
This study found no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes, complication rates, or implant positioning accuracy between PSI and SI in primary TSA. Future randomized controlled trials comparing these two types of instrumentation would be useful to assess whether a benefit exists for PSI in the setting of primary TSA. Level of evidence: III.
Authors
- Mohammad Daher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-9952)
- Wissam Abi Khalil
- Mohamad Y. Fares (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-3953)
- Peter Boufadel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-9148)
- Adam Z. Khan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-270X)
- Joseph Albert Abboud (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-7220)
- John G. Horneff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4802-9913)
- T. L. Parmar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-6282)
Institutions
- Colorado Permanente Medical Group (US)
- Rothman Institute (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
- Published
- 2025-05-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.01095
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.01