Utilization of Outpatient Mental Health Services During and 2 Years after the COVID-19 Pandemic

<b>Objective:</b> Analyze the impact of COVID-19 on outpatient mental health (OP-MH) utilization patterns, particularly telehealth, across eight different MH conditions with a 2-year follow-up. <b>Methods:</b> This population-based cohort study uses a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥18 and newly diagnosed with one of the eight MH disorders: psychotic, depressive, bipolar, anxiety, trauma-related, substance-use, other MH disorders, and two or more MH disorders. Monthly OP-MH utilization patterns were compared among patients in 2020-2021 newly diagnosed in 2019 to comparable prepandemic cohorts newly diagnosed in 2017. Multiple logistic regression models were conducted to examine differences in telehealth utilization across MH conditions. <b>Results:</b> Across groups, patients were mostly aged 65-84 (<i>n</i> = 39,749 [72.4%] in 2017 and <i>n</i> = 40,513 [75.5%] in 2019), female (<i>n</i> = 33,387 [60.8%] in 2017 and <i>n</i> = 32,193 [60.0%] in 2019), and White (<i>n</i> = 48,314 [88.0%] in 2017 and <i>n</i> = 47,282 [88.1%] in 2019). Total OP-MH utilization dropped (a 27.5% decrease at its lowest) for all MH conditions at the pandemic's onset compared with the nonexposure group. Although utilization increased postpandemic, slight disruptions remained until the end of 2021. Telehealth visits rose from 0.5% in January 2020 to 55% in April 2020, decreasing to 18% by December 2021. Regression analysis showed that patients with psychotic, bipolar, or trauma-related, and two or more MH disorders had higher odds of telehealth usage compared with those with anxiety, while patients with substance-use disorders had lower odds. Rural residents, older adults (65+), and men had lower odds of using telehealth, with residents of the Northeast and West regions showing higher odds compared with the South. Telehealth disparity profiles were uniquely associated with different MH conditions. <b>Conclusion and Relevance:</b> Findings highlight the need for tailored telehealth strategies among Medicare beneficiaries to address specific demographic and geographical disparities across MH conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0581
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization of Outpatient Mental Health Services During and 2 Years after the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sulki Park, Hye‐Chung Kum, Mark Lawley, Robert L. Ohsfeldt et al.
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Utilization of Outpatient Mental Health Services During and 2 Years after the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sulki Park, Hye‐Chung Kum, Mark Lawley, Robert L. Ohsfeldt, Michelle A. Hayek
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Analyze the impact of COVID-19 on outpatient mental health (OP-MH) utilization patterns, particularly telehealth, across eight different MH conditions with a 2-year follow-up. <b>Methods:</b> This population-based cohort study uses a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥18 and newly diagnosed with one of the eight MH disorders: psychotic, depressive, bipolar, anxiety, trauma-related, substance-use, other MH disorders, and two or more MH disorders. Monthly OP-MH utilization patterns were compared among patients in 2020-2021 newly diagnosed in 2019 to comparable prepandemic cohorts newly diagnosed in 2017. Multiple logistic regression models were conducted to examine differences in telehealth utilization across MH conditions. <b>Results:</b> Across groups, patients were mostly aged 65-84 (<i>n</i> = 39,749 [72.4%] in 2017 and <i>n</i> = 40,513 [75.5%] in 2019), female (<i>n</i> = 33,387 [60.8%] in 2017 and <i>n</i> = 32,193 [60.0%] in 2019), and White (<i>n</i> = 48,314 [88.0%] in 2017 and <i>n</i> = 47,282 [88.1%] in 2019). Total OP-MH utilization dropped (a 27.5% decrease at its lowest) for all MH conditions at the pandemic's onset compared with the nonexposure group. Although utilization increased postpandemic, slight disruptions remained until the end of 2021. Telehealth visits rose from 0.5% in January 2020 to 55% in April 2020, decreasing to 18% by December 2021. Regression analysis showed that patients with psychotic, bipolar, or trauma-related, and two or more MH disorders had higher odds of telehealth usage compared with those with anxiety, while patients with substance-use disorders had lower odds. Rural residents, older adults (65+), and men had lower odds of using telehealth, with residents of the Northeast and West regions showing higher odds compared with the South. Telehealth disparity profiles were uniquely associated with different MH conditions. <b>Conclusion and Relevance:</b> Findings highlight the need for tailored telehealth strategies among Medicare beneficiaries to address specific demographic and geographical disparities across MH conditions.

Telemedicine Journal and e-HealthVol. 31(9)
Boston University (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), National Center for PTSD (US), Texas A&M Health Science Center (US), Texas A&M University (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.