Algorithm‐facilitated discrimination: a socio‐legal study of the use by employers of artificial intelligence hiring systems

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) hiring systems (AHSs) are used by employers every day to screen and shortlist job candidates. Despite this, substantial gaps exist in our understanding of the real – as opposed to theoretical – risks of discrimination when these systems are deployed. This article reports on findings from qualitative empirical research investigating the use of AHSs by Australian employers. It demonstrates that the way in which these systems are operated in practice creates serious risks of algorithm‐facilitated discrimination. This may arise from the data, the use of proxies, the system's implementation, new structural barriers, a failure to provide reasonable adjustments, or the facilitation of intentional discrimination. These findings are significant, make an original contribution to an emerging field of research, and are relevant in any jurisdiction where an AHS is in use. There is a lot at stake when such discrimination occurs; as one research participant acknowledged, a ‘job application is literally a person's attempt to change their life with a new job’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Society
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12535
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithm‐facilitated discrimination: a socio‐legal study of the use by employers of artificial intelligence hiring systems

NATALIE SHEARD
2 citations
Journal of Law and Society
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
8.40
article

Algorithm‐facilitated discrimination: a socio‐legal study of the use by employers of artificial intelligence hiring systems

NATALIE SHEARD
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) hiring systems (AHSs) are used by employers every day to screen and shortlist job candidates. Despite this, substantial gaps exist in our understanding of the real – as opposed to theoretical – risks of discrimination when these systems are deployed. This article reports on findings from qualitative empirical research investigating the use of AHSs by Australian employers. It demonstrates that the way in which these systems are operated in practice creates serious risks of algorithm‐facilitated discrimination. This may arise from the data, the use of proxies, the system's implementation, new structural barriers, a failure to provide reasonable adjustments, or the facilitation of intentional discrimination. These findings are significant, make an original contribution to an emerging field of research, and are relevant in any jurisdiction where an AHS is in use. There is a lot at stake when such discrimination occurs; as one research participant acknowledged, a ‘job application is literally a person's attempt to change their life with a new job’.

Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 52(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.