Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures

Since the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, global policies, and agenda-setting milestones have emphasized that universal sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are unattainable without the meaningful engagement and inclusion of men. Despite this, the field of SRHR continues to struggle with how and in what ways men can and should be included in research, programs, and policies. In this commentary, we argue that the programmatic focus of SRHR limits the capacity to produce the data and evidence needed to inform gender transformational change. For men to be meaningfully engaged with by SRHR, researchers need an analytic lens that can capture the manifestations and outcomes of gender and power. We consider the conceptual complementarities between two theoretical frameworks: hegemonic masculinities and Reproductive Justice. We contend that bringing together these conceptual approaches to men and SRHR offers an analytic framework to iterate and innovate approaches to research. Such changes will allow for a greater interrogation of gender and power and the production of data and evidence necessary to grapple with the ongoing injustices that curtail people's sexual and reproductive freedoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Family Planning
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70003
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures

Ernestina Coast, Joe Strong, Malvern Chiweshe
Studies in Family Planning
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures

Ernestina Coast, Joe Strong, Malvern Chiweshe
article en

Abstract

Since the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994, global policies, and agenda-setting milestones have emphasized that universal sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are unattainable without the meaningful engagement and inclusion of men. Despite this, the field of SRHR continues to struggle with how and in what ways men can and should be included in research, programs, and policies. In this commentary, we argue that the programmatic focus of SRHR limits the capacity to produce the data and evidence needed to inform gender transformational change. For men to be meaningfully engaged with by SRHR, researchers need an analytic lens that can capture the manifestations and outcomes of gender and power. We consider the conceptual complementarities between two theoretical frameworks: hegemonic masculinities and Reproductive Justice. We contend that bringing together these conceptual approaches to men and SRHR offers an analytic framework to iterate and innovate approaches to research. Such changes will allow for a greater interrogation of gender and power and the production of data and evidence necessary to grapple with the ongoing injustices that curtail people's sexual and reproductive freedoms.

Studies in Family PlanningVol. 56(2)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Rhodes University (ZA), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures — Ernestina Coast, Joe Strong, et al. · Studies in Family Planning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS