Ethical Reconstruction of Linguistic Signs: An Ethical Study of Machine Translation Based on Linguistic Ontology

This study confronts the ethical crisis in machine translation (MT) caused by the systematic erosion of cultural semantics and symbolic integrity. While current MT systems achieve high technical performance (e.g., 72.3 BLEU scores in WMT2022), they fail to preserve cultural-contextual nuances, with 34.8% mistranslation rates for culturally loaded terms and 73% semantic reduction for low-resource language symbols. Through deconstructive analysis of Saussure’s arbitrariness principle and Wittgenstein’s language game theory, we demonstrate how algorithmic compression of dynamic semantic networks into unidirectional referential chains perpetuates symbolic violence, exemplified by the 89% loss of Confucian ethical dimensions in translating Chinese ren (benevolence) and 82% erasure of spiritual connotations in Arabic jihad. To address these issues, we propose the Symbolic Ethics Sensitivity Assessment Model (SESAM), a tripartite framework evaluating cultural fidelity, symbolic violence reduction, and ethical risk mitigation on a 0-5 scale. Validated in Meta’s No Language Left Behind project, SESAM increases cultural metaphor retention by 23.6% while maintaining translation efficiency. By integrating Peircean semiotics with computational linguistics, we construct a Cultural Semantic Vector Space using GloVe embeddings, resolving 93% of Traditional Chinese Medicine concept mapping failures. The study further develops the Linguistic Ethics Entropy (LEE) index, benchmarked at ≤0.23 for EU AI Act compliance, as the first quantitative metric for ethical MT. Our findings reveal three advancements: 1) semiotic topology exposing 47:1 corpus imbalance-induced cultural hegemony, 2) Ambiguity Markup Language (AML) reducing medical translation risks by 40%, and 3) an ontological framework reconciling Heideggerian linguistic essence with algorithmic probability through Derrida’s différance-encoded architectures. These interdisciplinary innovations bridge translation ethics, philosophy, and AI, offering actionable solutions for cultural DNA preservation and equitable cross-linguistic communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Literature & Language
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71204/859k3b53
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Reconstruction of Linguistic Signs: An Ethical Study of Machine Translation Based on Linguistic Ontology

Zhiyong Liang, Wenhao Shu
1 citations
Journal of Literature & Language
Translation Studies and Practices
10.42
article

Ethical Reconstruction of Linguistic Signs: An Ethical Study of Machine Translation Based on Linguistic Ontology

Zhiyong Liang, Wenhao Shu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study confronts the ethical crisis in machine translation (MT) caused by the systematic erosion of cultural semantics and symbolic integrity. While current MT systems achieve high technical performance (e.g., 72.3 BLEU scores in WMT2022), they fail to preserve cultural-contextual nuances, with 34.8% mistranslation rates for culturally loaded terms and 73% semantic reduction for low-resource language symbols. Through deconstructive analysis of Saussure’s arbitrariness principle and Wittgenstein’s language game theory, we demonstrate how algorithmic compression of dynamic semantic networks into unidirectional referential chains perpetuates symbolic violence, exemplified by the 89% loss of Confucian ethical dimensions in translating Chinese ren (benevolence) and 82% erasure of spiritual connotations in Arabic jihad. To address these issues, we propose the Symbolic Ethics Sensitivity Assessment Model (SESAM), a tripartite framework evaluating cultural fidelity, symbolic violence reduction, and ethical risk mitigation on a 0-5 scale. Validated in Meta’s No Language Left Behind project, SESAM increases cultural metaphor retention by 23.6% while maintaining translation efficiency. By integrating Peircean semiotics with computational linguistics, we construct a Cultural Semantic Vector Space using GloVe embeddings, resolving 93% of Traditional Chinese Medicine concept mapping failures. The study further develops the Linguistic Ethics Entropy (LEE) index, benchmarked at ≤0.23 for EU AI Act compliance, as the first quantitative metric for ethical MT. Our findings reveal three advancements: 1) semiotic topology exposing 47:1 corpus imbalance-induced cultural hegemony, 2) Ambiguity Markup Language (AML) reducing medical translation risks by 40%, and 3) an ontological framework reconciling Heideggerian linguistic essence with algorithmic probability through Derrida’s différance-encoded architectures. These interdisciplinary innovations bridge translation ethics, philosophy, and AI, offering actionable solutions for cultural DNA preservation and equitable cross-linguistic communication.

Journal of Literature & LanguageVol. 1(1)
Southwest University of Political Science & Law (CN), Guilin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Translation Studies and Practices
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.