Persuasive Surfaces and Calculating Machines. A Rhetorical Perspective on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract This essay examines the communicative implications of generative AI through a rhetorical lens. Rather than asking whether machines can truly ‘think,’ this approach considers how generative AI’s probabilistic outputs construct persuasive textual ‘surfaces’ that interact rhetorically with human communication. Authorship and meaning are no longer localized to a single individual creator but emerge through the interplay of human and machine co-construction of ‘possible worlds.’ By viewing generative AI as a ‘techné’ in the classical sense, we examine how models ‘imitate’ prior texts through algorithmic recombination. As AI accelerates information flows, it becomes increasingly important for individuals to develop rhetorical literacy, to deconstruct the interests and values encoded in AI’s persuasive surfaces. In contrast to the influential but one-directional information-theoretical communication model proposed by Shannon (1948), the essay advocates a rhetorical model of communication that emphasizes the active role of readers in reconstructing possible worlds from textual offers. Rather than neutral vessels of truth, generative AI outputs are inherently contingent yet interest-driven, requiring enhanced communicative competencies to navigate their impacts on changing concepts of reality, authorship, and common ground.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Philosophy
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-025-09748-3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persuasive Surfaces and Calculating Machines. A Rhetorical Perspective on Artificial Intelligence

Markus Gottschling, Olaf Krämer
Global Philosophy
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Persuasive Surfaces and Calculating Machines. A Rhetorical Perspective on Artificial Intelligence

Markus Gottschling, Olaf Krämer
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay examines the communicative implications of generative AI through a rhetorical lens. Rather than asking whether machines can truly ‘think,’ this approach considers how generative AI’s probabilistic outputs construct persuasive textual ‘surfaces’ that interact rhetorically with human communication. Authorship and meaning are no longer localized to a single individual creator but emerge through the interplay of human and machine co-construction of ‘possible worlds.’ By viewing generative AI as a ‘techné’ in the classical sense, we examine how models ‘imitate’ prior texts through algorithmic recombination. As AI accelerates information flows, it becomes increasingly important for individuals to develop rhetorical literacy, to deconstruct the interests and values encoded in AI’s persuasive surfaces. In contrast to the influential but one-directional information-theoretical communication model proposed by Shannon (1948), the essay advocates a rhetorical model of communication that emphasizes the active role of readers in reconstructing possible worlds from textual offers. Rather than neutral vessels of truth, generative AI outputs are inherently contingent yet interest-driven, requiring enhanced communicative competencies to navigate their impacts on changing concepts of reality, authorship, and common ground.

Global PhilosophyVol. 35(3)
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Volkswagen Foundation, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.