Effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercise with and without instrument assistance on pain and functional ability for nonspecific chronic low back pain among information technology professionals

INTRODUCTION: Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is the most frequent form of back pain which causes discomfort without any apparent cause. Nonspecific LBP has an estimated 18%-point prevalence. The healthcare professionals worldwide experience work-related chronic nonspecific LBP (CNLBP), which lasts for more than 12 weeks and is a significant contributor to functional impairment. Nonspecific LBP is a type of LBP that occurs when there is no known cause and the long-term persistence of discomfort and disability. Physiotherapists utilize a wide range of interventions in the management of CNLBP including lumbar stabilization exercises. The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of lumbar stabilization exercise with and without instrument assistance on pain and functional ability for nonspecific chronic LBP among information technology (IT) professionals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 subjects were selected for the study after obtaining an informed consent. Subjects who fulfill the following inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Each group will comprise of 20 subjects within the age group of 25–45 years. Group A will be given lumbar stabilization exercise with instrument assistance and Group B will be given lumbar stabilization exercise without instrument assistance. The parameters of the study include Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and lumbopelvic stability test pretest and posttest comparison done between the groups. RESULTS: The data were collected and statistically analyzed using the appropriate statistical test. Comparing pretest and posttest measures will be analyzed statistically using t -test to test the effectiveness of each technique. P value, between the group NPRS, PSFS, and LPS test, P ≤ 0.05 and shows significance in the subjects. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that lumbar stabilization exercise with instrument assistance was better than lumbar stabilization exercise without instrument assistance nonspecific chronic LBP among young adults and information technology professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy - The Journal of Indian Association of Physiotherapists
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/pjiap.pjiap_74_24
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercise with and without instrument assistance on pain and functional ability for nonspecific chronic low back pain among information technology professionals

Shazia Neelam N., P. Senthil, Saina Swathi, Sathish Loganathan
Physiotherapy - The Journal of Indian Association of Physiotherapists
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercise with and without instrument assistance on pain and functional ability for nonspecific chronic low back pain among information technology professionals

Shazia Neelam N., P. Senthil, Saina Swathi, Sathish Loganathan
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is the most frequent form of back pain which causes discomfort without any apparent cause. Nonspecific LBP has an estimated 18%-point prevalence. The healthcare professionals worldwide experience work-related chronic nonspecific LBP (CNLBP), which lasts for more than 12 weeks and is a significant contributor to functional impairment. Nonspecific LBP is a type of LBP that occurs when there is no known cause and the long-term persistence of discomfort and disability. Physiotherapists utilize a wide range of interventions in the management of CNLBP including lumbar stabilization exercises. The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of lumbar stabilization exercise with and without instrument assistance on pain and functional ability for nonspecific chronic LBP among information technology (IT) professionals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 subjects were selected for the study after obtaining an informed consent. Subjects who fulfill the following inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Each group will comprise of 20 subjects within the age group of 25–45 years. Group A will be given lumbar stabilization exercise with instrument assistance and Group B will be given lumbar stabilization exercise without instrument assistance. The parameters of the study include Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and lumbopelvic stability test pretest and posttest comparison done between the groups. RESULTS: The data were collected and statistically analyzed using the appropriate statistical test. Comparing pretest and posttest measures will be analyzed statistically using t -test to test the effectiveness of each technique. P value, between the group NPRS, PSFS, and LPS test, P ≤ 0.05 and shows significance in the subjects. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that lumbar stabilization exercise with instrument assistance was better than lumbar stabilization exercise without instrument assistance nonspecific chronic LBP among young adults and information technology professionals.

Physiotherapy - The Journal of Indian Association of PhysiotherapistsVol. 19(1)
Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.