Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability

BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was <i>excellent (weighted Kappa</i> = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was <i>good</i> for the anterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated <i>excellent</i> intra-rater and <i>good</i> inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251339380
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability

Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Patricio Luis López Tarrida, María-Luisa Benítez-Lugo, Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Clinical Rehabilitation
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability

Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Patricio Luis López Tarrida, María-Luisa Benítez-Lugo, Gema Chamorro-Moriana
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was <i>excellent (weighted Kappa</i> = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was <i>good</i> for the anterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated <i>excellent</i> intra-rater and <i>good</i> inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 39(7)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.