Quantifying Thrombogenicity: A Bioanalytical Protocol for the Absorbance-Based Assessment of Vascular Implants with Plasma

Assessing thrombogenicity is crucial for evaluating biomaterials, especially those that interface with flowing blood, such as cardiovascular implants, including vascular stents, grafts, and stent-grafts. To standardize thrombogenicity assessments, we use human plasma and quantify the light absorbance associated with the biomaterial. For this evaluation, various tubular vascular implants from leading brands-such as bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents, vascular grafts, and stent-grafts-are longitudinally sectioned into small pieces and placed in a low-adhesion 96-well plate. Using either platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-poor plasma (PPP), we measure the absorbance of light passing through the plate over an hour and plot the resulting curve. This method quantifies the thrombogenicity of a biomaterial under controlled conditions. Key factors examined include anticoagulants, platelet presence, and surface-coating molecules to assess their impact on thrombogenicity. Using this simple, reproducible protocol, we demonstrated (a) the relative efficacy of various anticoagulants in thrombogenicity assessments, and (b) the effectiveness of vascular coating molecules in reducing thrombogenicity on stents. This streamlined approach offers valuable insights for optimizing biomaterial performance in vascular implants. Unlike conventional clotting assays, which focus on standardized blood clotting mechanisms, this assay is tailored to evaluate biomaterials and external parameters influencing thrombogenicity. Key features • This protocol is a static, in vitro, quantitative assessment of thrombogenicity for both novel and commercial vascular biomaterials with flat or tubular geometries. • Thrombogenicity is assessed by evaluating the opaqueness of platelet-rich or platelet-poor plasma over time to measure fibrin formation. • Various anticoagulants such as sodium citrate, sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and sodium heparin are compared to evaluate the efficacy of the protocol. • This protocol compares the thrombogenicity of various commercial stents, grafts, and stent-graft hybrids, as well as novel molecular coatings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BIO-PROTOCOL
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21769/bioprotoc.5316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Thrombogenicity: A Bioanalytical Protocol for the Absorbance-Based Assessment of Vascular Implants with Plasma

Novella M. Keeling, Wei Tan, Richard Johnson, Aurora Battistella et al.
1 citations
BIO-PROTOCOL
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
2.01
article

Quantifying Thrombogenicity: A Bioanalytical Protocol for the Absorbance-Based Assessment of Vascular Implants with Plasma

Novella M. Keeling, Wei Tan, Richard Johnson, Aurora Battistella, Anna Sallee, Alexander Duong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Assessing thrombogenicity is crucial for evaluating biomaterials, especially those that interface with flowing blood, such as cardiovascular implants, including vascular stents, grafts, and stent-grafts. To standardize thrombogenicity assessments, we use human plasma and quantify the light absorbance associated with the biomaterial. For this evaluation, various tubular vascular implants from leading brands-such as bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents, vascular grafts, and stent-grafts-are longitudinally sectioned into small pieces and placed in a low-adhesion 96-well plate. Using either platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-poor plasma (PPP), we measure the absorbance of light passing through the plate over an hour and plot the resulting curve. This method quantifies the thrombogenicity of a biomaterial under controlled conditions. Key factors examined include anticoagulants, platelet presence, and surface-coating molecules to assess their impact on thrombogenicity. Using this simple, reproducible protocol, we demonstrated (a) the relative efficacy of various anticoagulants in thrombogenicity assessments, and (b) the effectiveness of vascular coating molecules in reducing thrombogenicity on stents. This streamlined approach offers valuable insights for optimizing biomaterial performance in vascular implants. Unlike conventional clotting assays, which focus on standardized blood clotting mechanisms, this assay is tailored to evaluate biomaterials and external parameters influencing thrombogenicity. Key features • This protocol is a static, in vitro, quantitative assessment of thrombogenicity for both novel and commercial vascular biomaterials with flat or tubular geometries. • Thrombogenicity is assessed by evaluating the opaqueness of platelet-rich or platelet-poor plasma over time to measure fibrin formation. • Various anticoagulants such as sodium citrate, sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and sodium heparin are compared to evaluate the efficacy of the protocol. • This protocol compares the thrombogenicity of various commercial stents, grafts, and stent-graft hybrids, as well as novel molecular coatings.

BIO-PROTOCOLVol. 15(1372)
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.