Evaluation of early-phase <sup>18</sup> F-Florbetaben PET as a surrogate biomarker of neurodegeneration: In-depth comparison with <sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET at group and single patient level

BackgroundImaging biomarkers are essential in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, particularly since the introduction of the ATN criteria by the NIA-AA. These criteria include amyloid-β plaques (amyloid PET), fibrillar tau (tau PET), and neurodegeneration (FDG PET or MRI). Early-phase amyloid PET imaging has shown a strong correlation with FDG PET at the group level.ObjectiveThis study evaluates the comparability of early-phase FBB PET (eFBB) perfusion imaging and FDG PET metabolic imaging at both group and individual levels.MethodsA retrospective study included 103 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia suspected of AD who underwent FDG PET and dual-phase <sup>18</sup>F-Florbetaben PET (including a 5-min eFBB scan) between 2019 and 2023, along with 33 healthy controls. Imaging analyses included qualitative, semi-quantitative, and voxel-wise techniques to compare eFBB and FDG PET scans.ResultseFBB and FDG PET SUVR values showed a strong correlation across all brain regions (rho = 0.879). Visual assessments of eFBB and FDG PET by two raters achieved intra-observer agreement rates of 87.5% and 86.4%, respectively. Voxel-wise analysis revealed moderate to good overlap, as indicated by Dice-Sørensen coefficients, in the MCI and mild dementia groups. Discriminative performance between eFBB and FDG PET was comparable, with no significant differences as eFBB reliably reflected brain metabolic patterns observed on FDG PET, supporting its diagnostic utility.ConclusionseFBB PET could serve as a surrogate biomarker for FDG PET in the diagnostic evaluation of neurodegenerative dementias. Dual-phase amyloid PET enables simultaneous assessment of neurodegeneration and amyloid burden, offering a streamlined and resource-efficient approach for clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251340380
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of early-phase 18 F-Florbetaben PET as a surrogate biomarker of neurodegeneration: In-depth comparison with 18 F-FDG PET at group and single patient level

Emilio Franco‐Macías, Alba Marta Marín-Cabañas, José Antonio Lojo-Ramírez, Paula Fernández‐Rodríguez et al.
4 citations
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
5.88
article

Evaluation of early-phase 18 F-Florbetaben PET as a surrogate biomarker of neurodegeneration: In-depth comparison with 18 F-FDG PET at group and single patient level

Emilio Franco‐Macías, Alba Marta Marín-Cabañas, José Antonio Lojo-Ramírez, Paula Fernández‐Rodríguez, J.M. Jiménez-Hoyuela-García, Miriam Guerra-Gómez, David García-Solís
article en
4 citations

Abstract

BackgroundImaging biomarkers are essential in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, particularly since the introduction of the ATN criteria by the NIA-AA. These criteria include amyloid-β plaques (amyloid PET), fibrillar tau (tau PET), and neurodegeneration (FDG PET or MRI). Early-phase amyloid PET imaging has shown a strong correlation with FDG PET at the group level.ObjectiveThis study evaluates the comparability of early-phase FBB PET (eFBB) perfusion imaging and FDG PET metabolic imaging at both group and individual levels.MethodsA retrospective study included 103 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia suspected of AD who underwent FDG PET and dual-phase <sup>18</sup>F-Florbetaben PET (including a 5-min eFBB scan) between 2019 and 2023, along with 33 healthy controls. Imaging analyses included qualitative, semi-quantitative, and voxel-wise techniques to compare eFBB and FDG PET scans.ResultseFBB and FDG PET SUVR values showed a strong correlation across all brain regions (rho = 0.879). Visual assessments of eFBB and FDG PET by two raters achieved intra-observer agreement rates of 87.5% and 86.4%, respectively. Voxel-wise analysis revealed moderate to good overlap, as indicated by Dice-Sørensen coefficients, in the MCI and mild dementia groups. Discriminative performance between eFBB and FDG PET was comparable, with no significant differences as eFBB reliably reflected brain metabolic patterns observed on FDG PET, supporting its diagnostic utility.ConclusionseFBB PET could serve as a surrogate biomarker for FDG PET in the diagnostic evaluation of neurodegenerative dementias. Dual-phase amyloid PET enables simultaneous assessment of neurodegeneration and amyloid burden, offering a streamlined and resource-efficient approach for clinical practice.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 106(1)
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.