The Effects of Disgust Messages on Plant‐Based Food Choice: Exploring Underlying Processes and Boundary Conditions

ABSTRACT This study investigated how emotional triggers, such as physical and moral disgust, influence consumers' choice of plant‐based foods over meat. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: (a) a physical disgust message emphasizing sensory aversion to meat, (b) a moral disgust message emphasizing ethical concerns related to meat consumption, or (c) a no‐message control condition. We examined whether the effect of the physical disgust message on food choice was mediated by hedonism and whether the effect of the moral disgust message was mediated by moral disengagement. In addition, we investigated whether the effect of the moral disgust message varied according to participants' belief in human supremacy. The results showed that the physical disgust message indirectly increased plant‐based food choice by reducing hedonism in meat consumption. In addition, the moral disgust message had a conditional effect: it significantly reduced moral disengagement and consequently increased plant‐based food choice, but only among individuals with medium and high beliefs in human supremacy. These results illustrate both a broad approach—using physical disgust to influence a wide audience—and a more targeted strategy where moral disgust may be effective for specific ideological profiles. Future research should further investigate whether these messages can be combined and how other psychological factors influence responses to disgust messages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13102
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Disgust Messages on Plant‐Based Food Choice: Exploring Underlying Processes and Boundary Conditions

Margherita Guidetti, Michela Lenzi, Sara Pompili, Valentina Carfora et al.
2 citations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
2.86
article

The Effects of Disgust Messages on Plant‐Based Food Choice: Exploring Underlying Processes and Boundary Conditions

Margherita Guidetti, Michela Lenzi, Sara Pompili, Valentina Carfora, Giulia Scaglioni, Patrizia Catellani, Luciana Carraro, Simone Festa, Italo Azzena
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigated how emotional triggers, such as physical and moral disgust, influence consumers' choice of plant‐based foods over meat. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: (a) a physical disgust message emphasizing sensory aversion to meat, (b) a moral disgust message emphasizing ethical concerns related to meat consumption, or (c) a no‐message control condition. We examined whether the effect of the physical disgust message on food choice was mediated by hedonism and whether the effect of the moral disgust message was mediated by moral disengagement. In addition, we investigated whether the effect of the moral disgust message varied according to participants' belief in human supremacy. The results showed that the physical disgust message indirectly increased plant‐based food choice by reducing hedonism in meat consumption. In addition, the moral disgust message had a conditional effect: it significantly reduced moral disengagement and consequently increased plant‐based food choice, but only among individuals with medium and high beliefs in human supremacy. These results illustrate both a broad approach—using physical disgust to influence a wide audience—and a more targeted strategy where moral disgust may be effective for specific ideological profiles. Future research should further investigate whether these messages can be combined and how other psychological factors influence responses to disgust messages.

Journal of Applied Social PsychologyVol. 55(6)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Padua (IT), Università degli Studi Internazionali di Roma (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.