Artificial intelligence and global carbon inequality: Addressing the challenges and opportunities for SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 13

• AI increases both inter- and intra-country carbon inequality. • Trade openness helps mitigate AI’s impact on carbon inequality between countries. • National governance reduces AI’s exacerbation of intra-country carbon inequality. • AI’s impact on carbon inequality is non-linear with thresholds. • AI regulation is necessary for promoting equitable global carbon outcomes. This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on carbon inequality (CI) in 67 countries from 1995 to 2019. The results suggest that (i) AI significantly amplifies CI both between and within countries due to its energy requirements and uneven deployment; (ii) trade openness and global value chain (GVC) positioning mitigate AI’s effect on inter-country CI, while robust governance—marked by larger government size and institutional transparency—curtails intra-country disparities; (iii) specific thresholds (trade openness > 4.74, GVC position > − 1.07, government size > 2.90, transparency > − 0.22) shift the impact of AI from exacerbating to reducing CI. The adverse effects of AI can be reversed through enhanced trade, GVC integration, and strong governance. Key policy implications: Policymakers must prioritize exceeding these thresholds to leverage AI for sustainable and equitable outcomes. This requires (a) promoting trade liberalization to spread the benefits of AI globally, reducing inter-country CI; (b) strengthening GVC participation to offset the carbon-intensive use of AI; (c) building government capacity and transparency to ensure fair adoption of AI domestically; and (d) embedding these strategies in climate policies to align AI with the long-term goals of environmental justice and the SDGs, particularly climate action (SDG 13) and reducing inequalities (SDG 10).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscience Frontiers
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102072
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and global carbon inequality: Addressing the challenges and opportunities for SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 13

Uğur Korkut Pata, Rongrong Li, Qiang Wang, Yuejia Li
4 citations
Geoscience Frontiers
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
12.52
article

Artificial intelligence and global carbon inequality: Addressing the challenges and opportunities for SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 13

Uğur Korkut Pata, Rongrong Li, Qiang Wang, Yuejia Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• AI increases both inter- and intra-country carbon inequality. • Trade openness helps mitigate AI’s impact on carbon inequality between countries. • National governance reduces AI’s exacerbation of intra-country carbon inequality. • AI’s impact on carbon inequality is non-linear with thresholds. • AI regulation is necessary for promoting equitable global carbon outcomes. This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on carbon inequality (CI) in 67 countries from 1995 to 2019. The results suggest that (i) AI significantly amplifies CI both between and within countries due to its energy requirements and uneven deployment; (ii) trade openness and global value chain (GVC) positioning mitigate AI’s effect on inter-country CI, while robust governance—marked by larger government size and institutional transparency—curtails intra-country disparities; (iii) specific thresholds (trade openness > 4.74, GVC position > − 1.07, government size > 2.90, transparency > − 0.22) shift the impact of AI from exacerbating to reducing CI. The adverse effects of AI can be reversed through enhanced trade, GVC integration, and strong governance. Key policy implications: Policymakers must prioritize exceeding these thresholds to leverage AI for sustainable and equitable outcomes. This requires (a) promoting trade liberalization to spread the benefits of AI globally, reducing inter-country CI; (b) strengthening GVC participation to offset the carbon-intensive use of AI; (c) building government capacity and transparency to ensure fair adoption of AI domestically; and (d) embedding these strategies in climate policies to align AI with the long-term goals of environmental justice and the SDGs, particularly climate action (SDG 13) and reducing inequalities (SDG 10).

Geoscience FrontiersVol. 16(4)
China University of Petroleum, East China (CN), Xinjiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.