My Perceptions are not your Perceptions: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisal on the Association between the Big Five Personality Traits and Emotional Reactivity

Personality, the enduring pattern of affect, behaviors, cognitions, and desires, strongly predicts important outcomes, such as mental and physical health, and specific emotional reactions. However, the reasons behind these associations are still unclear, and explanatory processes are now being searched for. Appraisal theories of emotion, particularly the Component Process Model of emotion, can help to address this gap. In this model, an <i>appraisal</i> <i>process</i><i>,</i> a situational cognitive evaluation, influences emotion unfolding by activating concomitant experiential, expressive, motivational and physiological responses. While evidence on the personality-appraisal relationship exists, specific knowledge about the potential mediatory role of appraisal in this relationship is very sparse, although it could explain how personality might shape emotional reactions. In a survey, we evaluated the personality of 500 participants (<i>M</i><sub>Age</sub> = 22.41; Females = 83.2%) and confronted them with two emotional scenarios of different valences. Leveraging exploratory mediation analysis (EMA), we found that, in the Negative Scenario, the appraisals of negative consequences, powerlessness, and future consequences adjustment emerged as the most influential mediators, being differentially implicated in the relationship between Neuroticism, on the one hand, and the Feeling and Autonomic Arousal components, on the other hand. Mediation pathways in the Positive Scenario were more diverse, with the appraisal of powerlessness again emerging as a relevant mediator in the relationship between traits and emotional outcomes. This study highlights appraisal as a fundamental explanatory mechanism linking individual differences to emotional responses. Appraisal could be thus leveraged in interventions to allow certain personality to take the path of specific, healthier affective outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Reports
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251335575
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

My Perceptions are not your Perceptions: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisal on the Association between the Big Five Personality Traits and Emotional Reactivity

Livia Sacchi, Elise Dan‐Glauser
1 citations
Psychological Reports
Mental Health Research Topics
2.12
article

My Perceptions are not your Perceptions: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisal on the Association between the Big Five Personality Traits and Emotional Reactivity

Livia Sacchi, Elise Dan‐Glauser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Personality, the enduring pattern of affect, behaviors, cognitions, and desires, strongly predicts important outcomes, such as mental and physical health, and specific emotional reactions. However, the reasons behind these associations are still unclear, and explanatory processes are now being searched for. Appraisal theories of emotion, particularly the Component Process Model of emotion, can help to address this gap. In this model, an <i>appraisal</i> <i>process</i><i>,</i> a situational cognitive evaluation, influences emotion unfolding by activating concomitant experiential, expressive, motivational and physiological responses. While evidence on the personality-appraisal relationship exists, specific knowledge about the potential mediatory role of appraisal in this relationship is very sparse, although it could explain how personality might shape emotional reactions. In a survey, we evaluated the personality of 500 participants (<i>M</i><sub>Age</sub> = 22.41; Females = 83.2%) and confronted them with two emotional scenarios of different valences. Leveraging exploratory mediation analysis (EMA), we found that, in the Negative Scenario, the appraisals of negative consequences, powerlessness, and future consequences adjustment emerged as the most influential mediators, being differentially implicated in the relationship between Neuroticism, on the one hand, and the Feeling and Autonomic Arousal components, on the other hand. Mediation pathways in the Positive Scenario were more diverse, with the appraisal of powerlessness again emerging as a relevant mediator in the relationship between traits and emotional outcomes. This study highlights appraisal as a fundamental explanatory mechanism linking individual differences to emotional responses. Appraisal could be thus leveraged in interventions to allow certain personality to take the path of specific, healthier affective outcomes.

Psychological Reports
University of Lausanne (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mental Health Research Topics
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.