Solidity and fluidity in the quantification of nature recovery: wild bird indicators in the UK

Purpose Putting nature on a path to recovery is a vital grand challenge facing humanity. Pursuing this challenge demands a clear, concrete sense of what such a path looks like, what it means to progress in building a “nature-positive” future. In this study, we aim to understand the quantification processes involved in defining and measuring progress towards nature recovery. Design/methodology/approach The UK Government’s wild bird indicators purport to represent the state of nature in the UK. Nature recovery, a “nature-positive” future for the UK, thus becomes understood in quantitative terms, as a future with increasing abundance of wild birds. We trace the cascade of inscriptions involved in this quantified future-making. Findings To help us analyse our case, we turn to a set of studies in the science and technology studies literature postulating fluidity as a corollary to the solidity of networks. In contrast to the immutable stability of network relations, the relations comprising fluid spaces are adaptable, malleable. We draw on these ideas to show how objects representing complex social-ecological arrangements are created and sustained through interplays of solidity and fluidity. Originality/value Fluidity, being other to solidity and stability, can be perceived as a failing, as a threat to calculation. We show, however, that, alongside stable network relations, successful quantification of the complexities of nature recovery can simultaneously necessitate production of adaptable, malleable relations. Quantification results from cascades of inscriptions that flow through intersections of network and fluid spaces.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-05-2024-7088
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solidity and fluidity in the quantification of nature recovery: wild bird indicators in the UK

Thomas Cuckston, Madlen Sobkowiak
5 citations
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Environmental Conservation and Management
12.11
article

Solidity and fluidity in the quantification of nature recovery: wild bird indicators in the UK

Thomas Cuckston, Madlen Sobkowiak
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose Putting nature on a path to recovery is a vital grand challenge facing humanity. Pursuing this challenge demands a clear, concrete sense of what such a path looks like, what it means to progress in building a “nature-positive” future. In this study, we aim to understand the quantification processes involved in defining and measuring progress towards nature recovery. Design/methodology/approach The UK Government’s wild bird indicators purport to represent the state of nature in the UK. Nature recovery, a “nature-positive” future for the UK, thus becomes understood in quantitative terms, as a future with increasing abundance of wild birds. We trace the cascade of inscriptions involved in this quantified future-making. Findings To help us analyse our case, we turn to a set of studies in the science and technology studies literature postulating fluidity as a corollary to the solidity of networks. In contrast to the immutable stability of network relations, the relations comprising fluid spaces are adaptable, malleable. We draw on these ideas to show how objects representing complex social-ecological arrangements are created and sustained through interplays of solidity and fluidity. Originality/value Fluidity, being other to solidity and stability, can be perceived as a failing, as a threat to calculation. We show, however, that, alongside stable network relations, successful quantification of the complexities of nature recovery can simultaneously necessitate production of adaptable, malleable relations. Quantification results from cascades of inscriptions that flow through intersections of network and fluid spaces.

Accounting Auditing & Accountability JournalVol. 38(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental Conservation and Management
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.