Investigating Grammatical Errors in EFL University Students' Argumentative Essays

The objective of this study is to analyse grammatical errors in argumentative texts written by university students, with a specific focus on identifying the most common errors and determining their underlying causes. This study applied an explanatory mixed-method design. The researchers employ the Surface Strategy Taxonomy to identify errors. The results indicate that students make four types of errors: omission (63%), addition (27,5%), misformation (5,7%), and misordering (3,8%). The study found that omission errors were the most common, whereas misordering errors were the least common. The interviews revealed that sentence structure problems in students' writing were influenced by both interference from their mother tongue and the tendency to overgeneralize English rules and norms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-24
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Grammatical Errors in EFL University Students' Argumentative Essays

Elitaria Bestri Agustina Siregar, Soraya Grabiella Dinamika, Muhammad Ridwan, Anik Tjandra Setiati
International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Investigating Grammatical Errors in EFL University Students' Argumentative Essays

Elitaria Bestri Agustina Siregar, Soraya Grabiella Dinamika, Muhammad Ridwan, Anik Tjandra Setiati
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyse grammatical errors in argumentative texts written by university students, with a specific focus on identifying the most common errors and determining their underlying causes. This study applied an explanatory mixed-method design. The researchers employ the Surface Strategy Taxonomy to identify errors. The results indicate that students make four types of errors: omission (63%), addition (27,5%), misformation (5,7%), and misordering (3,8%). The study found that omission errors were the most common, whereas misordering errors were the least common. The interviews revealed that sentence structure problems in students' writing were influenced by both interference from their mother tongue and the tendency to overgeneralize English rules and norms.

International Journal of Social Science and Human ResearchVol. 08(05)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.