Results of the survey on the perception of terrorist and sabotage threats among the experts of the EU Protective Security Advisors

This article presents the results of a survey on the perception of terrorist and sabotage threats by experts participating in the European Commission’s (DG Home) initiative EU Protective Security Advisors (EU PSA). The survey was conducted in February 2025 on a sample of 50 individuals representing EU PSA, EU institutions, and strategic project partners. The questionnaire covered several key aspects of terrorist and sabotage threats, including the types of potential targets, attack methods, and expected developments in hybrid threats. Respondents were also asked to assess which critical infrastructure systems require the highest priority in resilience-building efforts, as well as which counter-terrorism measures should be prioritised at the EU level. Additionally, the survey explored factors that could improve the security of protected facilities and identified the most likely perpetrators of attacks on EU critical infrastructure. The survey results provide valuable insights for shaping counter-terrorism and counter-sabotage policies at the EU level. The authors emphasise the necessity of standardising physical security measures and developing educational initiatives to build a security culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Terroryzm
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/27204383ter.25.022.21525
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results of the survey on the perception of terrorist and sabotage threats among the experts of the EU Protective Security Advisors

Damian Szlachter, Karolina Wojtasik
Terroryzm
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

Results of the survey on the perception of terrorist and sabotage threats among the experts of the EU Protective Security Advisors

Damian Szlachter, Karolina Wojtasik
article en

Abstract

This article presents the results of a survey on the perception of terrorist and sabotage threats by experts participating in the European Commission’s (DG Home) initiative EU Protective Security Advisors (EU PSA). The survey was conducted in February 2025 on a sample of 50 individuals representing EU PSA, EU institutions, and strategic project partners. The questionnaire covered several key aspects of terrorist and sabotage threats, including the types of potential targets, attack methods, and expected developments in hybrid threats. Respondents were also asked to assess which critical infrastructure systems require the highest priority in resilience-building efforts, as well as which counter-terrorism measures should be prioritised at the EU level. Additionally, the survey explored factors that could improve the security of protected facilities and identified the most likely perpetrators of attacks on EU critical infrastructure. The survey results provide valuable insights for shaping counter-terrorism and counter-sabotage policies at the EU level. The authors emphasise the necessity of standardising physical security measures and developing educational initiatives to build a security culture.

TerroryzmVol. 2025(Special Issue)
Centrum Badań Jakości (PL), Polskie Towarzystwo Gastroenterologii (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Results of the survey on the perception of terrorist and sabotage threats among the experts of the EU Protective Security Advisors — Damian Szlachter, Karolina Wojtasik · Terroryzm (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS