The effects of the expanded pandemic unemployment assistance on non‐standard workers' financial and mental wellbeing

Abstract During COVID‐19, for the first time in U.S. history, Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits were extended to non‐standard workers who are not typically eligible for that. Given the exclusion from the social security system, this offers an important opportunity to investigate such benefits on their economic and emotional security. To estimate it, I analyze staggered difference‐in‐differences and triple difference models using the Household Pulse Survey. I found that the early termination of the expanded pandemic UI program led to increases in financial and mental difficulties among residents, especially non‐standard workers with more difficulty in paying expenses and depression. These findings suggest that expanded eligibility for social insurance programs can help alleviate economic insecurity and associated mental health problems for categories of workers who have been excluded from the existing system, particularly in the face of unexpected crises and labor market disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.70007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of the expanded pandemic unemployment assistance on non‐standard workers' financial and mental wellbeing

Juhyun Bae
1 citations
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
article

The effects of the expanded pandemic unemployment assistance on non‐standard workers' financial and mental wellbeing

Juhyun Bae
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract During COVID‐19, for the first time in U.S. history, Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits were extended to non‐standard workers who are not typically eligible for that. Given the exclusion from the social security system, this offers an important opportunity to investigate such benefits on their economic and emotional security. To estimate it, I analyze staggered difference‐in‐differences and triple difference models using the Household Pulse Survey. I found that the early termination of the expanded pandemic UI program led to increases in financial and mental difficulties among residents, especially non‐standard workers with more difficulty in paying expenses and depression. These findings suggest that expanded eligibility for social insurance programs can help alleviate economic insecurity and associated mental health problems for categories of workers who have been excluded from the existing system, particularly in the face of unexpected crises and labor market disruptions.

Risk Management and Insurance ReviewVol. 28(2)
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.