SF-R You Sure? The Conflicting Role of Star Formation Rates in Constraining the Evolution of Milky Way Analogs in Cosmological Simulations

Abstract Milky Way analogs (MWAs) have long been studied by astronomers to place our Galaxy within an extragalactic context. With the power of cosmological simulations, we are now able to not only characterize MWAs today, but also watch as they evolve through cosmic time. We use the Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments (EAGLE) and Illustris The Next Generation (IllustrisTNG) simulations to study a group of MWAs defined by their stellar mass (SM) and star formation rate (SFR). We trace these galaxies back along their evolution to investigate the star-forming and mass assembly tracks taken by a galaxy to become an MWA today in light of these chosen parameters. We also take mock-observations of “MWAs” at z > 0 and trace them forward in time to determine if galaxies that looked similar to the Milky Way earlier in their evolution still look like the Milky Way today, thus quantifying a selection efficiency that could inform future observational studies of MWAs. We find that most galaxies with Milky Way–SM follow a similar evolution regardless of present-day SFR, although MWAs in IllustrisTNG generally have not quenched, leading to star formation histories that produce “too-blue” galaxies today. Additionally, we find contamination by MWA-“imposters” in our mock-observations, with low selection efficiency at high redshift due to the tight constraint requiring convergence to the Milky Way’s present-day SFR. Our work suggests present-day SM may suffice as a stand-alone selection parameter and helps to clarify how MWAs should be selected, and thus will be an important reference for future studies of both simulated and observed MWAs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc38c
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SF-R You Sure? The Conflicting Role of Star Formation Rates in Constraining the Evolution of Milky Way Analogs in Cosmological Simulations

Joshua S. Speagle, Kartheik G. Iyer, J. Ted Mackereth, Norman Murray et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

SF-R You Sure? The Conflicting Role of Star Formation Rates in Constraining the Evolution of Milky Way Analogs in Cosmological Simulations

Joshua S. Speagle, Kartheik G. Iyer, J. Ted Mackereth, Norman Murray, Alicia M. Savelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Milky Way analogs (MWAs) have long been studied by astronomers to place our Galaxy within an extragalactic context. With the power of cosmological simulations, we are now able to not only characterize MWAs today, but also watch as they evolve through cosmic time. We use the Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments (EAGLE) and Illustris The Next Generation (IllustrisTNG) simulations to study a group of MWAs defined by their stellar mass (SM) and star formation rate (SFR). We trace these galaxies back along their evolution to investigate the star-forming and mass assembly tracks taken by a galaxy to become an MWA today in light of these chosen parameters. We also take mock-observations of “MWAs” at z > 0 and trace them forward in time to determine if galaxies that looked similar to the Milky Way earlier in their evolution still look like the Milky Way today, thus quantifying a selection efficiency that could inform future observational studies of MWAs. We find that most galaxies with Milky Way–SM follow a similar evolution regardless of present-day SFR, although MWAs in IllustrisTNG generally have not quenched, leading to star formation histories that produce “too-blue” galaxies today. Additionally, we find contamination by MWA-“imposters” in our mock-observations, with low selection efficiency at high redshift due to the tight constraint requiring convergence to the Milky Way’s present-day SFR. Our work suggests present-day SM may suffice as a stand-alone selection parameter and helps to clarify how MWAs should be selected, and thus will be an important reference for future studies of both simulated and observed MWAs.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 984(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.