Reimagining South–South Higher Education Interactions Under “Triple Disruptions”

Purpose This study aims to investigate the different types of South–South higher education (HE) interactions in the context of “triple disruptions,” using the conceptual perspectives of Southern epistemologies and the typology of “inward- and outward-oriented” HE internationalization. Design/Approach/Methods This study analyzed a range of selected documents, including academic literature, national strategies and legislation, and public reports issued by states, institutions, and other stakeholders that focused on South–South HE interactions. The analysis centered on the rationales and strategies of different South–South HE interaction models. Findings The findings suggest that South–South HE interactions generally occur through a mix of approaches with a preference for inward-oriented expansion diffusion. Given the “triple disruptions,” regional cooperation based on advantages and characteristics remains the most promising form of South–South HE interactions. Additionally, the notion of new types of colonialism serves as a wake-up call for Southern countries’ outward-oriented HE internationalization through relocation diffusion for soft power enhancement. Originality/Value This study contributes to the critical examination of the Western-centric theoretical monopoly on internationalization in HE by clarifying the principles and positions of South–South HE cooperation through epistemological exploration. It draws patterns from the complex practices of existing South–South cooperation in HE based on a typology and attempts to provide theoretical contributions in the context of the “triple disruptions.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ECNU Review of Education
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251335986
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining South–South Higher Education Interactions Under “Triple Disruptions”

Hantian Wu, Jingji Zhang
2 citations
ECNU Review of Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
17.04
article

Reimagining South–South Higher Education Interactions Under “Triple Disruptions”

Hantian Wu, Jingji Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the different types of South–South higher education (HE) interactions in the context of “triple disruptions,” using the conceptual perspectives of Southern epistemologies and the typology of “inward- and outward-oriented” HE internationalization. Design/Approach/Methods This study analyzed a range of selected documents, including academic literature, national strategies and legislation, and public reports issued by states, institutions, and other stakeholders that focused on South–South HE interactions. The analysis centered on the rationales and strategies of different South–South HE interaction models. Findings The findings suggest that South–South HE interactions generally occur through a mix of approaches with a preference for inward-oriented expansion diffusion. Given the “triple disruptions,” regional cooperation based on advantages and characteristics remains the most promising form of South–South HE interactions. Additionally, the notion of new types of colonialism serves as a wake-up call for Southern countries’ outward-oriented HE internationalization through relocation diffusion for soft power enhancement. Originality/Value This study contributes to the critical examination of the Western-centric theoretical monopoly on internationalization in HE by clarifying the principles and positions of South–South HE cooperation through epistemological exploration. It draws patterns from the complex practices of existing South–South cooperation in HE based on a typology and attempts to provide theoretical contributions in the context of the “triple disruptions.”

ECNU Review of EducationVol. 8(3)
Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Governance and Development
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.