Performance of microbial desalination cells with different cathode types in treating saline wastewater

Microbial desalination cells (MDCs), as an emerging desalination technology, have attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their ability to simultaneously achieve salt removal and wastewater treatment without the need for external energy input. In this study, the performance of two MDC systems with different cathode types-a biocathode (MDC1<sup>#</sup>) and a permanganate cathode (MDC2<sup>#</sup>)-was comparatively evaluated for the treatment of saline wastewater, with a particular focus on voltage output, desalination efficiency, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. Experimental results showed that the average output voltage of MDC2<sup>#</sup> reached 742.02 mV, which was significantly higher than that of MDC1<sup>#</sup> (695.6 mV). Its maximum power density was as high as 6.22 W/m3, approximately six times that of MDC1<sup>#</sup>. Moreover, MDC2<sup>#</sup> exhibited a higher average chloride removal rate in the desalination chamber (32.34 mg/h), compared to 17.13 mg/h for MDC1<sup>#</sup>, indicating superior desalination performance. However, in terms of electron recovery, MDC1<sup>#</sup> achieved a much higher average Coulombic efficiency (28.8 ± 18.7%), nearly three times that of MDC2<sup>#</sup>, suggesting more efficient electron utilization with the biocathode. Regarding ammonium removal, MDC1<sup>#</sup> demonstrated a higher initial removal efficiency within the first 96 h (74.3%, with an average rate of 4.17 mg/h), but this declined sharply over time, with the later-stage rate dropping to only 0.32 mg/h (less than 10% of the initial rate). In contrast, MDC2<sup>#</sup> maintained a relatively stable ammonium removal rate throughout the operation (ranging from 0.58 to 3.27 mg/h, with an average of 1.92 mg/h). In addition, both systems achieved stable COD removal at the anode, with efficiencies consistently above 85%. Overall, the permanganate cathode is more suitable for applications that require high voltage output and efficient desalination, whereas the biocathode shows significant advantages in organic pollutant removal and energy recovery. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the rational selection of cathode types based on the characteristics of saline wastewater, offering valuable guidance for optimizing MDC system performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01295-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of microbial desalination cells with different cathode types in treating saline wastewater

Xinhui Han, Hongsheng Jia, Xiaoteng Liu, Xiaoning Ma et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
2.40
article

Performance of microbial desalination cells with different cathode types in treating saline wastewater

Xinhui Han, Hongsheng Jia, Xiaoteng Liu, Xiaoning Ma, Guang Li, Lianhong Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Microbial desalination cells (MDCs), as an emerging desalination technology, have attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their ability to simultaneously achieve salt removal and wastewater treatment without the need for external energy input. In this study, the performance of two MDC systems with different cathode types-a biocathode (MDC1<sup>#</sup>) and a permanganate cathode (MDC2<sup>#</sup>)-was comparatively evaluated for the treatment of saline wastewater, with a particular focus on voltage output, desalination efficiency, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. Experimental results showed that the average output voltage of MDC2<sup>#</sup> reached 742.02 mV, which was significantly higher than that of MDC1<sup>#</sup> (695.6 mV). Its maximum power density was as high as 6.22 W/m3, approximately six times that of MDC1<sup>#</sup>. Moreover, MDC2<sup>#</sup> exhibited a higher average chloride removal rate in the desalination chamber (32.34 mg/h), compared to 17.13 mg/h for MDC1<sup>#</sup>, indicating superior desalination performance. However, in terms of electron recovery, MDC1<sup>#</sup> achieved a much higher average Coulombic efficiency (28.8 ± 18.7%), nearly three times that of MDC2<sup>#</sup>, suggesting more efficient electron utilization with the biocathode. Regarding ammonium removal, MDC1<sup>#</sup> demonstrated a higher initial removal efficiency within the first 96 h (74.3%, with an average rate of 4.17 mg/h), but this declined sharply over time, with the later-stage rate dropping to only 0.32 mg/h (less than 10% of the initial rate). In contrast, MDC2<sup>#</sup> maintained a relatively stable ammonium removal rate throughout the operation (ranging from 0.58 to 3.27 mg/h, with an average of 1.92 mg/h). In addition, both systems achieved stable COD removal at the anode, with efficiencies consistently above 85%. Overall, the permanganate cathode is more suitable for applications that require high voltage output and efficient desalination, whereas the biocathode shows significant advantages in organic pollutant removal and energy recovery. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the rational selection of cathode types based on the characteristics of saline wastewater, offering valuable guidance for optimizing MDC system performance.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Jilin University (CN), Jilin Jianzhu University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.