Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation

Data curation is vital for selecting effective demonstration examples in graph-to-text generation. However, evaluating the quality of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) remains challenging. Prior research exhibits a narrow focus on structural statistics, such as the shortest path length, while the correctness of graphs in representing the associated text is rarely explored. To address this gap, we introduce a dual-perspective evaluation framework for KG-text data, based on the computation of structural adequacy and semantic alignment. From a structural perspective, we propose the Weighted Incremental Edge Method (WIEM) to quantify graph completeness by leveraging agreement between relation models to predict possible edges between entities. WIEM targets to find increments from models on “unseen links”, whose presence is inversely proportional to the structural adequacy of the original KG in representing the text. From a semantic perspective, we evaluate how well a KG aligns with the text in capturing the intended meaning. To do so, we instruct a large language model to convert KGs into natural language and measure the similarity between generated and reference texts. Based on these computations, we apply a Top-K union method, integrating the structural and semantic modules, to rank and select high-quality KGs. We evaluate our framework against various approaches for selecting few-shot examples in graph-to-text generation. Experiments on the Association for Computational Linguistics Abstract Graph Dataset (ACL-AGD) and Automatic Content Extraction 05 (ACE05) dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in distinguishing KG-text data of different qualities, evidenced by the largest performance gap between top- and bottom-ranked examples. We also find that the top examples selected through our dual-perspective framework consistently yield better performance than those selected by traditional measures. These results highlight the importance of data curation in improving graph-to-text generation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.066351
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation

Yves Lepage, Liyan Wang, Haotong Wang
Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation

Yves Lepage, Liyan Wang, Haotong Wang
article en

Abstract

Data curation is vital for selecting effective demonstration examples in graph-to-text generation. However, evaluating the quality of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) remains challenging. Prior research exhibits a narrow focus on structural statistics, such as the shortest path length, while the correctness of graphs in representing the associated text is rarely explored. To address this gap, we introduce a dual-perspective evaluation framework for KG-text data, based on the computation of structural adequacy and semantic alignment. From a structural perspective, we propose the Weighted Incremental Edge Method (WIEM) to quantify graph completeness by leveraging agreement between relation models to predict possible edges between entities. WIEM targets to find increments from models on “unseen links”, whose presence is inversely proportional to the structural adequacy of the original KG in representing the text. From a semantic perspective, we evaluate how well a KG aligns with the text in capturing the intended meaning. To do so, we instruct a large language model to convert KGs into natural language and measure the similarity between generated and reference texts. Based on these computations, we apply a Top-K union method, integrating the structural and semantic modules, to rank and select high-quality KGs. We evaluate our framework against various approaches for selecting few-shot examples in graph-to-text generation. Experiments on the Association for Computational Linguistics Abstract Graph Dataset (ACL-AGD) and Automatic Content Extraction 05 (ACE05) dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in distinguishing KG-text data of different qualities, evidenced by the largest performance gap between top- and bottom-ranked examples. We also find that the top examples selected through our dual-perspective framework consistently yield better performance than those selected by traditional measures. These results highlight the importance of data curation in improving graph-to-text generation.

Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)Vol. 84(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation — Yves Lepage, Liyan Wang, et al. · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS