Towards the Real-World Analysis of Lumbar Spine Standing Posture in Individuals with Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Prolonged periods of standing are linked to low back pain (LBP). Evaluating lumbar spine biomechanics in real-world contexts can provide novel insights into these links. This study aimed to determine if standing behaviour can be quantified, in individuals with LBP, in real-world environments. A three-stage design was used, (i) Verification of a bespoke algorithm characterising lumbar standing behaviour, (ii) Day-long assessment of standing behaviours of individuals with posture-related low back discomfort, and (iii) Case study application to individuals with clinical LBP. Analysis of standing posture across time included variability, fidgeting, and amplitude probability distribution function analysis. The study demonstrated that accelerometers are a valid method for extracting standing posture from everyday activity data. There was a wide variety of postures throughout the day in people with posture-related low back discomfort and people with clinical LBP. Frequency profiles ranged from slightly flexed to slightly extended postures, with skewed bell-shaped distributions common. Postural variability ranged from 3.4° to 7.7°, and fidgeting from 1.0° to 3.0°. This work presents a validated accelerometer-based method to capture, identify, and quantify real-world lumbar standing postures. The distinct characteristics of people with low back discomfort or pain highlight the importance of individualised approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25102983
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards the Real-World Analysis of Lumbar Spine Standing Posture in Individuals with Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Jonathan M. Williams, F. A. McClintock, Andrew Callaway, Elena Muñoz‐Gómez et al.
2 citations
Sensors
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
article

Towards the Real-World Analysis of Lumbar Spine Standing Posture in Individuals with Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Jonathan M. Williams, F. A. McClintock, Andrew Callaway, Elena Muñoz‐Gómez, Carol Clark, Raee S. Alqhtani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Prolonged periods of standing are linked to low back pain (LBP). Evaluating lumbar spine biomechanics in real-world contexts can provide novel insights into these links. This study aimed to determine if standing behaviour can be quantified, in individuals with LBP, in real-world environments. A three-stage design was used, (i) Verification of a bespoke algorithm characterising lumbar standing behaviour, (ii) Day-long assessment of standing behaviours of individuals with posture-related low back discomfort, and (iii) Case study application to individuals with clinical LBP. Analysis of standing posture across time included variability, fidgeting, and amplitude probability distribution function analysis. The study demonstrated that accelerometers are a valid method for extracting standing posture from everyday activity data. There was a wide variety of postures throughout the day in people with posture-related low back discomfort and people with clinical LBP. Frequency profiles ranged from slightly flexed to slightly extended postures, with skewed bell-shaped distributions common. Postural variability ranged from 3.4° to 7.7°, and fidgeting from 1.0° to 3.0°. This work presents a validated accelerometer-based method to capture, identify, and quantify real-world lumbar standing postures. The distinct characteristics of people with low back discomfort or pain highlight the importance of individualised approaches.

SensorsVol. 25(10)
Universitat de València (ES), Najran University (SA), Bournemouth University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.