Re-evaluating the Malaysian shadow economy: evidence from public expenditure patterns

Purpose While financial crime theory posits that systemic vulnerabilities in fiscal governance enable illicit enrichment, prior studies disproportionately attribute shadow economy (SE) growth to tax burdens. This study aims to re-evaluate Malaysia’s SE (1970–2022) through a financial crime lens, arguing that inflated public expenditure (PE) fosters institutionalized fraud, where officials exploit fiscal expenditures to obtain illicit incomes. Design/methodology/approach Using a modified Pickhardt−Pons currency demand approach (CDA), this study integrates Gregory-Hansen cointegration and autoregressive distributed lag bounds testing to quantify SE size amid structural breaks. Findings Results reveal SE averages 24.2% of gross domestic product (RM117.42bn), peaking during PE spikes related to infrastructure booms and opaque tendering processes. This aligns with institutional anomie theory, where Malaysia’s growth-centric bureaucracy diverting PE into informal networks. Unlike tax-centric models, the PE framework exposes how SE actors exploit lax oversight in high-spending environments to legitimize illicit flows. The findings counter traditional tax-burden narratives, showing that variability in SE are primarily driven by PE growth rather than by taxation. Originality/value This study reinterprets the SE in Malaysia by focusing on the misuse of public expenditure rather than tax evasion. Grounded in financial crime theory, it reveals how weak enforcement and political incentives contribute to the persistence of informal activities. The analysis shifts attention from traditional tax-based explanations to institutional vulnerabilities that enable financial misconduct. By highlighting these dynamics, the research offers valuable insights for policy reform. It supports anti-corruption strategies focused on improving transparency in public procurement and strengthening expenditure audits, rather than relying on tax increases to control SE growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Crime
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-08-2024-0246
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-evaluating the Malaysian shadow economy: evidence from public expenditure patterns

Awadh Ahmed Mohammed Gamal, Norasibah Abdul Jalil, Pei-Tha Gan, Mohammed Umar et al.
Journal of Financial Crime
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Re-evaluating the Malaysian shadow economy: evidence from public expenditure patterns

Awadh Ahmed Mohammed Gamal, Norasibah Abdul Jalil, Pei-Tha Gan, Mohammed Umar, Amera Mohammed Ahmed Amer, Zainzam Zakariya
article en

Abstract

Purpose While financial crime theory posits that systemic vulnerabilities in fiscal governance enable illicit enrichment, prior studies disproportionately attribute shadow economy (SE) growth to tax burdens. This study aims to re-evaluate Malaysia’s SE (1970–2022) through a financial crime lens, arguing that inflated public expenditure (PE) fosters institutionalized fraud, where officials exploit fiscal expenditures to obtain illicit incomes. Design/methodology/approach Using a modified Pickhardt−Pons currency demand approach (CDA), this study integrates Gregory-Hansen cointegration and autoregressive distributed lag bounds testing to quantify SE size amid structural breaks. Findings Results reveal SE averages 24.2% of gross domestic product (RM117.42bn), peaking during PE spikes related to infrastructure booms and opaque tendering processes. This aligns with institutional anomie theory, where Malaysia’s growth-centric bureaucracy diverting PE into informal networks. Unlike tax-centric models, the PE framework exposes how SE actors exploit lax oversight in high-spending environments to legitimize illicit flows. The findings counter traditional tax-burden narratives, showing that variability in SE are primarily driven by PE growth rather than by taxation. Originality/value This study reinterprets the SE in Malaysia by focusing on the misuse of public expenditure rather than tax evasion. Grounded in financial crime theory, it reveals how weak enforcement and political incentives contribute to the persistence of informal activities. The analysis shifts attention from traditional tax-based explanations to institutional vulnerabilities that enable financial misconduct. By highlighting these dynamics, the research offers valuable insights for policy reform. It supports anti-corruption strategies focused on improving transparency in public procurement and strengthening expenditure audits, rather than relying on tax increases to control SE growth.

Journal of Financial CrimeVol. 32(4)
Sultan Idris Education University (MY), Federal University Kashere (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.