Positive–Unlabeled Learning-Based Hybrid Models and Interpretability for Groundwater Potential Mapping in Karst Areas

Despite the increasing adoption of machine learning and data-driven models for predicting regional groundwater potential (GWP), exploration geoscientists have recognized that these models still face various challenges in their predictive precision. For instance, the stochastic uncertainty associated with incomplete groundwater investigation inventories and the inherent non-transparency characteristic of machine learning models, which lack transparency regarding how input features influence outcomes, pose significant challenges. This research constructs a bagging-based learning framework that integrates Positive–Unlabeled samples (BPUL), along with ex-post interpretability, to map the GWP of the Lijiang River Basin in China, a renowned karst region. For this purpose, we first aggregated various topographic, hydrological, geological, meteorological, and land conditional factors. The training samples were enhanced with data from the subterranean stream investigated in the study area, in addition to conventional groundwater inventories such as wells, boreholes, and karst springs. We employed the BPUL algorithm with four different base learners—Logistic Regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)—and model validation was conducted to map the GWP in karst regions. The findings indicate that all models exhibit satisfactory performance in GWP mapping, with the hybrid ensemble models (RF-BPUL and LightGBM-BPUL) achieving higher validation scores. The model interpretation of the aggregated SHAP values revealed the contribution patterns of various conditional factors to groundwater distribution in karst zones, emphasizing that lithology, the multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness (MRVBF), and the geochemical element calcium oxide (CaO) have the most significant impact on groundwater enrichment in karst zones. These findings offer new approaches and methodologies for the in-depth exploration and scientific prediction of groundwater potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101422
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positive–Unlabeled Learning-Based Hybrid Models and Interpretability for Groundwater Potential Mapping in Karst Areas

Benteng Bi, Chen Yang, Tianyu Luo, Jingwen Li et al.
Water
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

Positive–Unlabeled Learning-Based Hybrid Models and Interpretability for Groundwater Potential Mapping in Karst Areas

Benteng Bi, Chen Yang, Tianyu Luo, Jingwen Li, Bo Wang, Lina Shen
article en

Abstract

Despite the increasing adoption of machine learning and data-driven models for predicting regional groundwater potential (GWP), exploration geoscientists have recognized that these models still face various challenges in their predictive precision. For instance, the stochastic uncertainty associated with incomplete groundwater investigation inventories and the inherent non-transparency characteristic of machine learning models, which lack transparency regarding how input features influence outcomes, pose significant challenges. This research constructs a bagging-based learning framework that integrates Positive–Unlabeled samples (BPUL), along with ex-post interpretability, to map the GWP of the Lijiang River Basin in China, a renowned karst region. For this purpose, we first aggregated various topographic, hydrological, geological, meteorological, and land conditional factors. The training samples were enhanced with data from the subterranean stream investigated in the study area, in addition to conventional groundwater inventories such as wells, boreholes, and karst springs. We employed the BPUL algorithm with four different base learners—Logistic Regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)—and model validation was conducted to map the GWP in karst regions. The findings indicate that all models exhibit satisfactory performance in GWP mapping, with the hybrid ensemble models (RF-BPUL and LightGBM-BPUL) achieving higher validation scores. The model interpretation of the aggregated SHAP values revealed the contribution patterns of various conditional factors to groundwater distribution in karst zones, emphasizing that lithology, the multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness (MRVBF), and the geochemical element calcium oxide (CaO) have the most significant impact on groundwater enrichment in karst zones. These findings offer new approaches and methodologies for the in-depth exploration and scientific prediction of groundwater potential.

WaterVol. 17(10)
Guilin University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.