Effects of different urban vegetation cover and green space types on soil greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration

The development of urbanization has led to the creation of various types of green spaces, which have a direct influence on vegetation types and soil management, This, in turn, results in differences in soil carbon sequestration capacities. However, the factors affecting soil carbon sequestration in different vegetation types within urban green spaces remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, the study focused on the soil of urban green space. A one-year field observation was conducted, utilizing local management archives and historical data, to evaluate variations in soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and soil organic carbon sequestration across grassland (GL), shrubs (SH), and forests stands (FS) within three types of green spaces: park green space (P), residential green space (Ra), and street green space (s). The results indicated that: (1) In comparison to grassland (GL), the CO 2 flux of shrubs (SH) and forests stands (FS) declined by 10.73% and 14.46%, respectively, while the N 2 O and CH 4 fluxes remained insignificant. Additionally, the annual increase in soil organic carbon was lower by 8.92% and 10.80% in shrub and forests stand, respectively; (2) Variations in greenhouse gas fluxes were also observed among the three types of green spaces. In comparison to park green spaces, the CO 2 flux of residential and street soils decreased by 2.11% and 3.25%, respectively, while the N 2 O flux dropped by 16.61% and 22.41%, respectively. The CH 4 flux remained insignificant. The annual increase of SOC in residential and streets was notably lower than that in parks green spaces, by 9.59% and 15.20%, respectively, indicating significant differences. This suggests that soil carbon sequestration capacity is highly responsive to changes in vegetation coverage and green space types, with WSOC, NH 4 + -N, and pH identified as the primary factors influencing the greenhouse gas flux in the three soils. This study provides data and a theoretical basis for the strategic selection of urban soil management measures, particularly in the context of achieving carbon neutrality goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1555628
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of different urban vegetation cover and green space types on soil greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration

Xuekun Cheng, Yongjun Shi, Zhaohui Ni, Rongbin Zhang et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
1.72
article

Effects of different urban vegetation cover and green space types on soil greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration

Xuekun Cheng, Yongjun Shi, Zhaohui Ni, Rongbin Zhang, Yangen Chen, Yufeng Zhou, Lu Feng, Shuhan Liu, Haitao Shi, Chen Wu, Dabiao Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The development of urbanization has led to the creation of various types of green spaces, which have a direct influence on vegetation types and soil management, This, in turn, results in differences in soil carbon sequestration capacities. However, the factors affecting soil carbon sequestration in different vegetation types within urban green spaces remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, the study focused on the soil of urban green space. A one-year field observation was conducted, utilizing local management archives and historical data, to evaluate variations in soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and soil organic carbon sequestration across grassland (GL), shrubs (SH), and forests stands (FS) within three types of green spaces: park green space (P), residential green space (Ra), and street green space (s). The results indicated that: (1) In comparison to grassland (GL), the CO 2 flux of shrubs (SH) and forests stands (FS) declined by 10.73% and 14.46%, respectively, while the N 2 O and CH 4 fluxes remained insignificant. Additionally, the annual increase in soil organic carbon was lower by 8.92% and 10.80% in shrub and forests stand, respectively; (2) Variations in greenhouse gas fluxes were also observed among the three types of green spaces. In comparison to park green spaces, the CO 2 flux of residential and street soils decreased by 2.11% and 3.25%, respectively, while the N 2 O flux dropped by 16.61% and 22.41%, respectively. The CH 4 flux remained insignificant. The annual increase of SOC in residential and streets was notably lower than that in parks green spaces, by 9.59% and 15.20%, respectively, indicating significant differences. This suggests that soil carbon sequestration capacity is highly responsive to changes in vegetation coverage and green space types, with WSOC, NH 4 + -N, and pH identified as the primary factors influencing the greenhouse gas flux in the three soils. This study provides data and a theoretical basis for the strategic selection of urban soil management measures, particularly in the context of achieving carbon neutrality goals.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Second Hospital of Yichang (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Lishui Academy of Forestry (CN), Zhejiang Academy of Forestry (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.