Evaluation of Spousal Support and Stress Coping Styles of Pregnant Women Diagnosed with Fetal Anomaly

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Pregnant women may experience various difficulties when abnormal conditions are detected in their babies. We examined the relationship between anxiety and depression levels, spousal support, and stress-coping styles in pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A total of 157 pregnant women, 59 of whom were diagnosed with fetal anomalies and 98 of whom were healthy with no obstetric complications, were included in this study. All participants were administered the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Spousal Support Scale (SSS), and Coping Styles Scale (CSS) questionnaires. The data were compared statistically. <i>Results:</i> The BAI (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the Submissive Approach (<i>p</i> = 0.004), which is a subdimension of the CSS, were significantly higher in the group of pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies than in the control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis performed to calculate the risk of fetal anomalies showed that having a high school education or below and living in the city were associated with a higher risk of fetal anomaly than living in the countryside. The cut-off value of 4 for the BAI had a sensitivity of 64.4% and a specificity of 65.3. Additionally, a cut-off value of 6 for the Submissive Approach, a CSS subdimension, had a 66.1% sensitivity and a 57.1% specificity. A significant negative correlation was observed between the Spousal Support Scale, the BDI, and the gravidity in the case group. There was a positive correlation between the BAI and the BDI and a significant negative correlation between the BAI and these CSS subdimensions: Self-Confident Approach, Seeking Social Support, and Optimistic Approach. There was a positive correlation between the BDI and the Helpless Approach subdimension of the CSS and a significant negative correlation between the BDI and the Self-Confident Approach and Optimistic Approach subdimensions, as well as the gestational age at which fetal anomaly was detected. A significant positive correlation was observed between the BDI and the Helpless Approach subdimension of the CSS, while significant negative correlations were observed between the BDI and the Self-Confident Approach and Optimistic Approach subdimensions and the gestational age at which the fetal anomaly was detected. <i>Conclusions:</i> The pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies experienced anxiety, but most tended to use the submissive coping style to deal with stress, and their partners also supported them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050868
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Spousal Support and Stress Coping Styles of Pregnant Women Diagnosed with Fetal Anomaly

Sevler Yıldız, Atalay Ekin, Ceren Sağlam, S. Can et al.
1 citations
Medicina
Family and Disability Support Research
2.31
article

Evaluation of Spousal Support and Stress Coping Styles of Pregnant Women Diagnosed with Fetal Anomaly

Sevler Yıldız, Atalay Ekin, Ceren Sağlam, S. Can, Hakan Gölbaşı
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Pregnant women may experience various difficulties when abnormal conditions are detected in their babies. We examined the relationship between anxiety and depression levels, spousal support, and stress-coping styles in pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A total of 157 pregnant women, 59 of whom were diagnosed with fetal anomalies and 98 of whom were healthy with no obstetric complications, were included in this study. All participants were administered the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Spousal Support Scale (SSS), and Coping Styles Scale (CSS) questionnaires. The data were compared statistically. <i>Results:</i> The BAI (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the Submissive Approach (<i>p</i> = 0.004), which is a subdimension of the CSS, were significantly higher in the group of pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies than in the control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis performed to calculate the risk of fetal anomalies showed that having a high school education or below and living in the city were associated with a higher risk of fetal anomaly than living in the countryside. The cut-off value of 4 for the BAI had a sensitivity of 64.4% and a specificity of 65.3. Additionally, a cut-off value of 6 for the Submissive Approach, a CSS subdimension, had a 66.1% sensitivity and a 57.1% specificity. A significant negative correlation was observed between the Spousal Support Scale, the BDI, and the gravidity in the case group. There was a positive correlation between the BAI and the BDI and a significant negative correlation between the BAI and these CSS subdimensions: Self-Confident Approach, Seeking Social Support, and Optimistic Approach. There was a positive correlation between the BDI and the Helpless Approach subdimension of the CSS and a significant negative correlation between the BDI and the Self-Confident Approach and Optimistic Approach subdimensions, as well as the gestational age at which fetal anomaly was detected. A significant positive correlation was observed between the BDI and the Helpless Approach subdimension of the CSS, while significant negative correlations were observed between the BDI and the Self-Confident Approach and Optimistic Approach subdimensions and the gestational age at which the fetal anomaly was detected. <i>Conclusions:</i> The pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies experienced anxiety, but most tended to use the submissive coping style to deal with stress, and their partners also supported them.

MedicinaVol. 61(5)
Izmir University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Family and Disability Support Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.