Research on the Differences between the Securities Markets of China and the United States

This article aims to analyze the current development status and differences of the securities and fund industries in China and the United States and explore the reasons for the Chinese government's reduced attention to securitization. The article first emphasizes the importance of securities funds in modern financial markets, pointing out the leading position of US mutual funds in the global mutual fund industry, as well as the rapid development of Chinese securities funds in recent years. The article reviews the current research status related to securitization, pointing out the development of securitization markets in China and the United States, as well as the importance of securitization in disposing of non-performing assets and complying with Chinese government policies. At the same time, the article also summarizes the legal deficiencies of the Chinese government in taxation, credit rating, and enhancement issues, and suggests improving the transparency of relevant securities information and establishing a unified trading execution system. When comparing the development of the fund industry between China and the United States, the article found that there are differences and similarities in investment strategies, government roles, and financial regulatory agency functions between the two countries. The article also explores the differences in the size, investor structure, and valuation levels of the securities markets in the United States and China, and analyzes the main reasons for market development history, regulatory system and legal environment, and market participant structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Economics Business and Management Research
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/88q2bf13
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Differences between the Securities Markets of China and the United States

Z. Deng
Transactions on Economics Business and Management Research
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Research on the Differences between the Securities Markets of China and the United States

Z. Deng
article en

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the current development status and differences of the securities and fund industries in China and the United States and explore the reasons for the Chinese government's reduced attention to securitization. The article first emphasizes the importance of securities funds in modern financial markets, pointing out the leading position of US mutual funds in the global mutual fund industry, as well as the rapid development of Chinese securities funds in recent years. The article reviews the current research status related to securitization, pointing out the development of securitization markets in China and the United States, as well as the importance of securitization in disposing of non-performing assets and complying with Chinese government policies. At the same time, the article also summarizes the legal deficiencies of the Chinese government in taxation, credit rating, and enhancement issues, and suggests improving the transparency of relevant securities information and establishing a unified trading execution system. When comparing the development of the fund industry between China and the United States, the article found that there are differences and similarities in investment strategies, government roles, and financial regulatory agency functions between the two countries. The article also explores the differences in the size, investor structure, and valuation levels of the securities markets in the United States and China, and analyzes the main reasons for market development history, regulatory system and legal environment, and market participant structure.

Transactions on Economics Business and Management ResearchVol. 14
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.