Development and Prioritization of Flood Vulnerability Indicators for Nabunturan, Davao de Oro

Flooding remains one of the most prevalent and destructive natural hazards, threatening infrastructure, livelihoods, and communities worldwide. This study conducted a systematic assessment of flood vulnerability in Nabunturan, Davao de Oro, a municipality prone to recurrent flooding. Utilizing the UNESCO-IHE flood vulnerability indicators, the research examined the Social, Economic, Environmental, and Physical components of vulnerability. These indicators were categorized into three subdimensions—exposure, susceptibility, and resilience—and were evaluated using the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) to achieve expert consensus, followed by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize key factors influencing flood vulnerability. The study identified and prioritized 27 flood vulnerability indicators, with normalized weights (ranging from 0 to 1) derived from the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), reflecting the relative importance of each factor. Higher-weighted indicators serve as the basis for prioritization of risk reduction actions and resilience-building efforts. The study revealed the indicators with the highest weights per component, arranged in exposure, susceptibility, and resilience, respectively. Social Component: Population in Flood-prone Areas (0.3114); Past Experience (0.4314); Shelters/Hospitals (0.2685). Economic Component: Land Use (0.5230); Quality of Infrastructure (0.6149); Amount of Investment (1.0). Environmental Component: Degraded Area (1.0); Rainfall (0.5091); Green Area (1.0). Physical Component: Topography (0.2958); Frequency of Occurrence (1.0); Dikes/Levees (1.0). The weighted indicators can support the computation of a Flood Vulnerability Index (FVI), informing Barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plans (BDRRMPs), enhancing the Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA), and guiding targeted risk reduction and adaptation programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Davao Research Journal
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v16i2.373
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Prioritization of Flood Vulnerability Indicators for Nabunturan, Davao de Oro

Alex S. Olpenda, Frincess Jade C Cajano
1 citations
Davao Research Journal
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
article

Development and Prioritization of Flood Vulnerability Indicators for Nabunturan, Davao de Oro

Alex S. Olpenda, Frincess Jade C Cajano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Flooding remains one of the most prevalent and destructive natural hazards, threatening infrastructure, livelihoods, and communities worldwide. This study conducted a systematic assessment of flood vulnerability in Nabunturan, Davao de Oro, a municipality prone to recurrent flooding. Utilizing the UNESCO-IHE flood vulnerability indicators, the research examined the Social, Economic, Environmental, and Physical components of vulnerability. These indicators were categorized into three subdimensions—exposure, susceptibility, and resilience—and were evaluated using the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) to achieve expert consensus, followed by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize key factors influencing flood vulnerability. The study identified and prioritized 27 flood vulnerability indicators, with normalized weights (ranging from 0 to 1) derived from the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), reflecting the relative importance of each factor. Higher-weighted indicators serve as the basis for prioritization of risk reduction actions and resilience-building efforts. The study revealed the indicators with the highest weights per component, arranged in exposure, susceptibility, and resilience, respectively. Social Component: Population in Flood-prone Areas (0.3114); Past Experience (0.4314); Shelters/Hospitals (0.2685). Economic Component: Land Use (0.5230); Quality of Infrastructure (0.6149); Amount of Investment (1.0). Environmental Component: Degraded Area (1.0); Rainfall (0.5091); Green Area (1.0). Physical Component: Topography (0.2958); Frequency of Occurrence (1.0); Dikes/Levees (1.0). The weighted indicators can support the computation of a Flood Vulnerability Index (FVI), informing Barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plans (BDRRMPs), enhancing the Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA), and guiding targeted risk reduction and adaptation programs.

Davao Research JournalVol. 16(2)
Central Mindanao University (PH), University of Mindanao (PH), Davao del Norte State College (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.