Evidence of Huge Difference between Ground- and Excited-State Curves: NUV-Excited, Red (Ba, Sr, Ca)<sub>7</sub>(SiO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>:Eu<sup>2+</sup> Having a Large Stokes Shift

According to our previous experimental results, the comparison concerning the temperature dependence of emission half-width based on Henderson-Imbush equation between (Ca,Sr)7(SiO3)6Cl2:Eu2+ (CaSSC), having a large Stokes shift from NUV to yellow, and (Ba,Sr,Ca)7(SiO3)6Cl2:Eu2+ (BaSSC), having a further larger Stokes shift from NUV to red, revealed that the traditional theory “Stokes shift = 2 × S × ℏω or (2S – 1) × ℏω” (S, Huang–Rhys parameter; ℏω, quantized phonon energy; ω, angular frequency of vibration) does not hold. Here, we tried to judge whether the equality in the two curvatures of ground and excited states in the configurational coordinate model, the basis for the above equation, is precise or incorrect. In this paper, we performed a simulation by using the quantitative data of BaSSC. By using the data of excitation–emission spectra and the temperature dependence of emission intensity, we determined the activation energy for excited electrons exceeding the intersection of two ground- and excited-state curves (nonemissive process) in addition to excitation energy and emission energy. These values were used to pursue a relationship between two coupling constants in two harmonic oscillators at the ground state and excited state and the equilibrium position offset between the ground- and excited-state curves in Eu2+-anion. Although the equilibrium position offset did not converge, interestingly, the ratio of the two coupling constants in the ground and excited states converged and was able to be determined to be 0.23 ± 0.01. It was found that the coupling constant in the excited state does not match that in the ground state at all, being quite smaller, 1/4, or less. It was strongly considered that the excited-state curve is much looser than the ground-state curve in the case of Eu2+ phosphors having a large Stokes shift.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Optical Materials
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaom.5c00008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence of Huge Difference between Ground- and Excited-State Curves: NUV-Excited, Red (Ba, Sr, Ca)7(SiO3)6Cl2:Eu2+ Having a Large Stokes Shift

Takatoshi Seto
1 citations
ACS Applied Optical Materials
Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
0.52
article

Evidence of Huge Difference between Ground- and Excited-State Curves: NUV-Excited, Red (Ba, Sr, Ca)7(SiO3)6Cl2:Eu2+ Having a Large Stokes Shift

Takatoshi Seto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

According to our previous experimental results, the comparison concerning the temperature dependence of emission half-width based on Henderson-Imbush equation between (Ca,Sr)7(SiO3)6Cl2:Eu2+ (CaSSC), having a large Stokes shift from NUV to yellow, and (Ba,Sr,Ca)7(SiO3)6Cl2:Eu2+ (BaSSC), having a further larger Stokes shift from NUV to red, revealed that the traditional theory “Stokes shift = 2 × S × ℏω or (2S – 1) × ℏω” (S, Huang–Rhys parameter; ℏω, quantized phonon energy; ω, angular frequency of vibration) does not hold. Here, we tried to judge whether the equality in the two curvatures of ground and excited states in the configurational coordinate model, the basis for the above equation, is precise or incorrect. In this paper, we performed a simulation by using the quantitative data of BaSSC. By using the data of excitation–emission spectra and the temperature dependence of emission intensity, we determined the activation energy for excited electrons exceeding the intersection of two ground- and excited-state curves (nonemissive process) in addition to excitation energy and emission energy. These values were used to pursue a relationship between two coupling constants in two harmonic oscillators at the ground state and excited state and the equilibrium position offset between the ground- and excited-state curves in Eu2+-anion. Although the equilibrium position offset did not converge, interestingly, the ratio of the two coupling constants in the ground and excited states converged and was able to be determined to be 0.23 ± 0.01. It was found that the coupling constant in the excited state does not match that in the ground state at all, being quite smaller, 1/4, or less. It was strongly considered that the excited-state curve is much looser than the ground-state curve in the case of Eu2+ phosphors having a large Stokes shift.

ACS Applied Optical MaterialsVol. 3(5)
Lanzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.