Holistic Benefit–Cost Analysis of Bridge Seismic Retrofitting Coupled with Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Policy

Highway bridges are fundamental components of transportation networks. Although chronic deterioration of bridge conditions has been the primary focus of bridge asset management, the implications of seismic hazards, as well as their interaction with bridge maintenance and seismic retrofitting strategies has yet to be fully studied. This study aims to quantitatively assess the long-term performance and cost effectiveness of various seismic retrofitting options when coupled with artificial intelligence (AI)–based maintenance decision policies. To achieve this, bridge component deterioration is modeled using Markov processes. To account for seismic hazard threats, bridge system-level seismic fragility and risk quantification modules are introduced to estimate seismic damage probabilities. The analysis also includes a comprehensive evaluation of both direct and indirect costs associated with maintenance and retrofitting actions for life-cycle cost estimations. Next, the developed bridge performance and life-cycle cost models are coupled with a powerful AI approach known as deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to provide a comprehensive bridge management policy. Finally, the study presents an AI-based maintenance policy integrated with seismic retrofitting strategies and compared with condition-based maintenance policy. The findings underscore the benefits of a holistic AI-driven decision-making process that can manage both routine maintenance and seismic repair actions. Moreover, the evaluation of seismic retrofitting within an AI-driven maintenance framework highlights the long-term benefits of such integration, especially for high seismicity regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251328984
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic Benefit–Cost Analysis of Bridge Seismic Retrofitting Coupled with Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Policy

Alireza Ghavidel, Ao Du, Sabarethinam Kameshwar
2 citations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
1.91
article

Holistic Benefit–Cost Analysis of Bridge Seismic Retrofitting Coupled with Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Policy

Alireza Ghavidel, Ao Du, Sabarethinam Kameshwar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Highway bridges are fundamental components of transportation networks. Although chronic deterioration of bridge conditions has been the primary focus of bridge asset management, the implications of seismic hazards, as well as their interaction with bridge maintenance and seismic retrofitting strategies has yet to be fully studied. This study aims to quantitatively assess the long-term performance and cost effectiveness of various seismic retrofitting options when coupled with artificial intelligence (AI)–based maintenance decision policies. To achieve this, bridge component deterioration is modeled using Markov processes. To account for seismic hazard threats, bridge system-level seismic fragility and risk quantification modules are introduced to estimate seismic damage probabilities. The analysis also includes a comprehensive evaluation of both direct and indirect costs associated with maintenance and retrofitting actions for life-cycle cost estimations. Next, the developed bridge performance and life-cycle cost models are coupled with a powerful AI approach known as deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to provide a comprehensive bridge management policy. Finally, the study presents an AI-based maintenance policy integrated with seismic retrofitting strategies and compared with condition-based maintenance policy. The findings underscore the benefits of a holistic AI-driven decision-making process that can manage both routine maintenance and seismic repair actions. Moreover, the evaluation of seismic retrofitting within an AI-driven maintenance framework highlights the long-term benefits of such integration, especially for high seismicity regions.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardVol. 2679(7)
Louisiana State University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.