Utilizing Dimensions of Trust to Communicate with Consumers About the Science Behind Food

Communicating the science behind food production to consumers is increasingly complex due to the proliferation of food innovations, information overload, and the presence of misinformation. Trust plays a pivotal role in consumer perceptions of food safety and acceptance of new food technologies. This study explores consumers' trust in food by segmenting audiences based on cognitive trust in science, affective trust in new foods, and dispositional trust in sources of food information. Using a survey of 1011 United States consumer respondents, cluster analysis identified five distinct trust segments: Lack Trust, Trusting, On the Fence, Trust New Food Not Science or Sources, and Trust Science not New Food. Results revealed significant demographic differences among the five segments, with age, education, political ideology, and dietary preferences influencing trust levels. Findings contribute to audience segmentation theory by demonstrating the coexistence of multiple trust dimensions and their impact on food-related decision-making. Practically, this study provides a framework for science communicators and policymakers to tailor messaging strategies that align with consumer trust profiles, ultimately fostering informed decision-making in the food system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101674
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilizing Dimensions of Trust to Communicate with Consumers About the Science Behind Food

Nicholas K Gabler, Catherine E. Sanders, Allison R. Byrd, Alexa J. Lamm et al.
1 citations
Foods
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

Utilizing Dimensions of Trust to Communicate with Consumers About the Science Behind Food

Nicholas K Gabler, Catherine E. Sanders, Allison R. Byrd, Alexa J. Lamm, Michael S. Retallick, Kevan W. Lamm
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Communicating the science behind food production to consumers is increasingly complex due to the proliferation of food innovations, information overload, and the presence of misinformation. Trust plays a pivotal role in consumer perceptions of food safety and acceptance of new food technologies. This study explores consumers' trust in food by segmenting audiences based on cognitive trust in science, affective trust in new foods, and dispositional trust in sources of food information. Using a survey of 1011 United States consumer respondents, cluster analysis identified five distinct trust segments: Lack Trust, Trusting, On the Fence, Trust New Food Not Science or Sources, and Trust Science not New Food. Results revealed significant demographic differences among the five segments, with age, education, political ideology, and dietary preferences influencing trust levels. Findings contribute to audience segmentation theory by demonstrating the coexistence of multiple trust dimensions and their impact on food-related decision-making. Practically, this study provides a framework for science communicators and policymakers to tailor messaging strategies that align with consumer trust profiles, ultimately fostering informed decision-making in the food system.

FoodsVol. 14(10)
North Carolina State University (US), University of Georgia (US), Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.