Fiscal opportunity coupled with political willingness? Unpacking the effects of TELs and partisan governments on income inequality in the American states, 1986–2020

Abstract Governments shape policy outcomes using two distinct mechanisms: rules and discretion. A simple decomposition strategy is proposed for distinguishing between these policymaking mechanisms on income inequality in the American states from 1986 to 2020. This analytical strategy is easily applicable to other policy settings. The statistical evidence, for the most part, that income inequality observed in the American states is generally unaffected by both TELs and partisan control of state governments—the lone exception being unified Republican state governments operating under a TEL. The decomposition evidence, however, shows that this is primarily the result of discretionary policymaking differences among partisan governments. This study underscores the importance of disentangling policy mechanisms that jointly occur when evaluating the consequences of government policymaking authority.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.30
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fiscal opportunity coupled with political willingness? Unpacking the effects of TELs and partisan governments on income inequality in the American states, 1986–2020

Michelle L. Lofton, George Krause
Political Science Research and Methods
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Fiscal opportunity coupled with political willingness? Unpacking the effects of TELs and partisan governments on income inequality in the American states, 1986–2020

Michelle L. Lofton, George Krause
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governments shape policy outcomes using two distinct mechanisms: rules and discretion. A simple decomposition strategy is proposed for distinguishing between these policymaking mechanisms on income inequality in the American states from 1986 to 2020. This analytical strategy is easily applicable to other policy settings. The statistical evidence, for the most part, that income inequality observed in the American states is generally unaffected by both TELs and partisan control of state governments—the lone exception being unified Republican state governments operating under a TEL. The decomposition evidence, however, shows that this is primarily the result of discretionary policymaking differences among partisan governments. This study underscores the importance of disentangling policy mechanisms that jointly occur when evaluating the consequences of government policymaking authority.

Political Science Research and MethodsVol. 14(2)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fiscal opportunity coupled with political willingness? Unpacking the effects of TELs and partisan governments on income inequality in the American states, 1986–2020 — Michelle L. Lofton, George Krause · Political Science Research and Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS