Field-Curing Methods for Evaluating the Strength of Concrete Test Specimens

The purpose of this combined laboratory and field study was to evaluate field-curing methods of concrete specimens for estimating the early opening strength of an in-place concrete item. One Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) class PV mix was used to cast cylinders, beams, and in-place concrete slabs in October 2021 and February 2022. Concrete cylinders were cured using three methods: ambient air (method #C1), an insulated box/cooler (method #C2), and a power-operated box (method #C3). Beams were cured using two methods: ambient air (method #B1) and an insulated plywood box (method #B2). The cast-in-place specimens from each slab and cylinder were tested for compressive strength, and beams were tested for flexural strength after 1, 3, and 7 days of curing. One cylinder and one beam in each curing method along with slabs were embedded with sensors to collect temperature variation with time. Only methods #C1, #C2, and #B1 were selected for evaluating further in the field, and data were collected from the IDOT District 5 box culvert demonstration project. Laboratory results showed that the insulated box (method #C2) estimated early (1–3 days) and ambient air (method #C1) estimated the 7-day compressive strength of an in-place concrete item within an acceptable range. Field results showed that method #C2 cylinders mimic the in-pour temperature better than method #C1 cylinders. Further statistical analyses supported the results observed in the laboratory and field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251324192
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field-Curing Methods for Evaluating the Strength of Concrete Test Specimens

Haiyan Xie, Pranshoo Solanki
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
article

Field-Curing Methods for Evaluating the Strength of Concrete Test Specimens

Haiyan Xie, Pranshoo Solanki
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this combined laboratory and field study was to evaluate field-curing methods of concrete specimens for estimating the early opening strength of an in-place concrete item. One Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) class PV mix was used to cast cylinders, beams, and in-place concrete slabs in October 2021 and February 2022. Concrete cylinders were cured using three methods: ambient air (method #C1), an insulated box/cooler (method #C2), and a power-operated box (method #C3). Beams were cured using two methods: ambient air (method #B1) and an insulated plywood box (method #B2). The cast-in-place specimens from each slab and cylinder were tested for compressive strength, and beams were tested for flexural strength after 1, 3, and 7 days of curing. One cylinder and one beam in each curing method along with slabs were embedded with sensors to collect temperature variation with time. Only methods #C1, #C2, and #B1 were selected for evaluating further in the field, and data were collected from the IDOT District 5 box culvert demonstration project. Laboratory results showed that the insulated box (method #C2) estimated early (1–3 days) and ambient air (method #C1) estimated the 7-day compressive strength of an in-place concrete item within an acceptable range. Field results showed that method #C2 cylinders mimic the in-pour temperature better than method #C1 cylinders. Further statistical analyses supported the results observed in the laboratory and field.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardVol. 2679(7)
Illinois State University (US)
Illinois Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.