Outcome of Pregnancy in Booked Vs Un-Booked Patients

Objective: To determine the outcome of pregnancy in booked vs un-booked patients. Study Design: Comparative, cross sectional. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. From 1st January 2025 to 31st March 2025. Methodology: Total 570 primigravida or multigravida of 18-40 years of age and both booked and un-booked. Women with known gestational diabetes mellitus, renal, liver, and heart conditions, as well as anemia (Hb<11g/dl), were not included. Patients were divided into two groups as per their booking status. Booked Patients were kept in group A and unbooked patients were kept in group B. Patients in both the groups were followed till delivery and outcome was noted in terms of preterm birth, emergency caesarean section, Intrauterine Death or Neonatal Death). Results: 20 patients (7.02%) in Group A delivered preterm, 17 patients (5.96%) had emergency cesarean section, 11 patients (3.86%) had intrauterine death, and there were 05 (1.76%) documented neonatal death. Group B, on the other hand, had adverse outcome: 53 patients (18.60%) reported preterm birth, 34 (11.93%) had emergency cesarean section, and 29 (10.18%) had intrauterine death. In Group B, 13 patients (4.56%) had neonatal death. We provide the p-values for preterm birth (p=0.0001), emergency cesarean section (p=0.0126), intrauterine death (p=0.0032) and neonatal death (p=0.0462). Conclusion: This study concluded that women who are unbooked throughout pregnancy have higher negative pregnancy outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1097
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome of Pregnancy in Booked Vs Un-Booked Patients

Sana Iqbal, Sarfraz Khan, Zia Ul Mustafa, Iqra Kanwal et al.
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Outcome of Pregnancy in Booked Vs Un-Booked Patients

Sana Iqbal, Sarfraz Khan, Zia Ul Mustafa, Iqra Kanwal, Naureen Javed, Adnan Murtaza
article en

Abstract

Objective: To determine the outcome of pregnancy in booked vs un-booked patients. Study Design: Comparative, cross sectional. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. From 1st January 2025 to 31st March 2025. Methodology: Total 570 primigravida or multigravida of 18-40 years of age and both booked and un-booked. Women with known gestational diabetes mellitus, renal, liver, and heart conditions, as well as anemia (Hb<11g/dl), were not included. Patients were divided into two groups as per their booking status. Booked Patients were kept in group A and unbooked patients were kept in group B. Patients in both the groups were followed till delivery and outcome was noted in terms of preterm birth, emergency caesarean section, Intrauterine Death or Neonatal Death). Results: 20 patients (7.02%) in Group A delivered preterm, 17 patients (5.96%) had emergency cesarean section, 11 patients (3.86%) had intrauterine death, and there were 05 (1.76%) documented neonatal death. Group B, on the other hand, had adverse outcome: 53 patients (18.60%) reported preterm birth, 34 (11.93%) had emergency cesarean section, and 29 (10.18%) had intrauterine death. In Group B, 13 patients (4.56%) had neonatal death. We provide the p-values for preterm birth (p=0.0001), emergency cesarean section (p=0.0126), intrauterine death (p=0.0032) and neonatal death (p=0.0462). Conclusion: This study concluded that women who are unbooked throughout pregnancy have higher negative pregnancy outcomes.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(5)
Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Punjab Medical College (PK), Allied Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.