BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

Background: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a globally endorsed strategy to enhance the quality of life and social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Despite its potential, barriers to equitable access and implementation persist, particularly in under-resourced settings. Objective: To explore the key barriers and facilitators influencing access to and engagement with community-based rehabilitation services among disabled individuals. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted over eight months across five rehabilitation centers. Thirty-five participants with various disabilities were recruited through purposive sampling. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews, the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Quantitative data were analyzed using parametric tests, while thematic analysis was employed for qualitative insights. Correlation analysis was used to explore associations between disability-related challenges and community integration. Results: Home integration scored highest on the CIQ (mean = 7.8, SD = 2.1), while productive activities scored lowest (mean = 3.9, SD = 1.6). WHODAS results indicated high impairment in participation (mean = 40.2, SD = 6.9) and life activities (mean = 35.9, SD = 7.2). Negative correlations were observed between WHODAS scores and CIQ outcomes (p < 0.05). Commonly reported barriers included inaccessible transport (83%) and lack of assistive devices (71%), whereas facilitators involved family support (74%) and continuity of care (63%). Conclusion: Barriers to community-based rehabilitation remain significant, but targeted facilitators offer practical avenues for enhancing access and participation. Strengthening policy frameworks, transport accessibility, and community-oriented interventions can substantially improve rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/qq4qh015
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

Sana Durvesh, Muhammad Kashif, G.M. Masud Rana, Muhammad Moin Ashraf et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Disability Education and Employment
article

BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

Sana Durvesh, Muhammad Kashif, G.M. Masud Rana, Muhammad Moin Ashraf, Sana Islam, Izya Taj, Mehwish Ikhlaque
article en

Abstract

Background: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a globally endorsed strategy to enhance the quality of life and social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Despite its potential, barriers to equitable access and implementation persist, particularly in under-resourced settings. Objective: To explore the key barriers and facilitators influencing access to and engagement with community-based rehabilitation services among disabled individuals. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted over eight months across five rehabilitation centers. Thirty-five participants with various disabilities were recruited through purposive sampling. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews, the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Quantitative data were analyzed using parametric tests, while thematic analysis was employed for qualitative insights. Correlation analysis was used to explore associations between disability-related challenges and community integration. Results: Home integration scored highest on the CIQ (mean = 7.8, SD = 2.1), while productive activities scored lowest (mean = 3.9, SD = 1.6). WHODAS results indicated high impairment in participation (mean = 40.2, SD = 6.9) and life activities (mean = 35.9, SD = 7.2). Negative correlations were observed between WHODAS scores and CIQ outcomes (p < 0.05). Commonly reported barriers included inaccessible transport (83%) and lack of assistive devices (71%), whereas facilitators involved family support (74%) and continuity of care (63%). Conclusion: Barriers to community-based rehabilitation remain significant, but targeted facilitators offer practical avenues for enhancing access and participation. Strengthening policy frameworks, transport accessibility, and community-oriented interventions can substantially improve rehabilitation outcomes.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(3 (Health & Allied))
Yong In University (KR), Allama Iqbal Open University (PK), Riphah International University (PK), HITEC University (PK), Superior University (PK), Greenwich University (PK), Canterbury District Health Board (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.