<b>I Will Recommend A Salad but Choose A Burger for You: the Effect of Decision Tasks and Social Distance on Food Decisions for Others</b>

While food decisions are usually personal, consumers often need to make these decisions for other people. In this research, we examine how consumers make food decisions under two decision tasks (recommendation vs. choice) and for others who are socially distant or close to themselves. We argue that consumers focus on others’ preferences when choosing on others’ behalf, whereas they focus on decision justification when recommending to others. In three experimental studies we show that consumers make different choices versus recommendations for others, and this difference is more pronounced in the decisions for distant (vs. close) others. These findings contribute to the literature on decision making and food consumption by identifying the conditions under which consumers are likely to make healthy or unhealthy food decisions for other people. These findings also provide practical implications for consumers to make (better) decisions for others and assess the decisions that others have made for them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Business & Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63522/jabbs.101005
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

I Will Recommend A Salad but Choose A Burger for You: the Effect of Decision Tasks and Social Distance on Food Decisions for Others

Ying Jiang, Jing Lei
9 citations
Journal of Applied Business & Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Health and Interventions
13.90
article

I Will Recommend A Salad but Choose A Burger for You: the Effect of Decision Tasks and Social Distance on Food Decisions for Others

Ying Jiang, Jing Lei
article en
9 citations

Abstract

While food decisions are usually personal, consumers often need to make these decisions for other people. In this research, we examine how consumers make food decisions under two decision tasks (recommendation vs. choice) and for others who are socially distant or close to themselves. We argue that consumers focus on others’ preferences when choosing on others’ behalf, whereas they focus on decision justification when recommending to others. In three experimental studies we show that consumers make different choices versus recommendations for others, and this difference is more pronounced in the decisions for distant (vs. close) others. These findings contribute to the literature on decision making and food consumption by identifying the conditions under which consumers are likely to make healthy or unhealthy food decisions for other people. These findings also provide practical implications for consumers to make (better) decisions for others and assess the decisions that others have made for them.

Journal of Applied Business & Behavioral SciencesVol. 1(1)
Ontario Tech University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
13.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.