The Effects of Chronic Neck Pain on Spinal Posture, Spinal Mobility and Handgrip Strength in Older Adults

Aim: The objective of the study was to compare spinal posture, spinal mobility, and handgrip strength between the participants aged 65 and over with and without Chronic Neck Pain (CNP). Material and Method: A total of 35 participants aged 65 and over, 17 older people with a diagnosis of CNP (CNP group) and 18 older people without CNP (control group), were included in this cross-sectional study. The Spinal Mouse device was used to measure spinal posture for the positions of vertebral column and spinal mobility for the movements in sagittal and frontal planes for the vertebral column. Handgrip strength was measured with a hand dynamometer. Results: The mean age of the CNP group and the control group were 69.88±4.66 years and 71.50±4.61 years (p>0.05), respectively. There were significant differences in right and left handgrip strength between the CNP group and the control group, respectively (p=0.008, p=0.022). According to the spinal posture values, the mean length of the vertebral column in CNP group was higher than the controls (p=0.028). In addition, the lumbar and pelvic inclination angles were different between the groups in maximum flexion positions (p=0.040 and p=0.027, respectively). According to the spinal mobility values, the mean pelvic inclination angle was lower in the CNP group than the controls from the upright position to the flexion movement (p=0.023). In addition, the lumbar and pelvic inclination angles were lower in the CNP group than the controls from the maximum extension to the maximum flexion movement (p=0.017 and p=0.013, respectively). Conclusion: This study showed that the length of the vertebral column and the grip strength were higher in the older adults with CNP than the controls. According to the spinal posture, the lumbar angle and pelvic inclination angle were lower in the older adults with CNP than the controls. According to the spinal mobility, the pelvic inclination and lumbar angles in the older adults with CNP were lower than the controls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Records
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1660072
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Chronic Neck Pain on Spinal Posture, Spinal Mobility and Handgrip Strength in Older Adults

Kadirhan Özdemir, Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin, Koray Şahin
Medical Records
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The Effects of Chronic Neck Pain on Spinal Posture, Spinal Mobility and Handgrip Strength in Older Adults

Kadirhan Özdemir, Nilay Yürekdeler Şahin, Koray Şahin
article en

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the study was to compare spinal posture, spinal mobility, and handgrip strength between the participants aged 65 and over with and without Chronic Neck Pain (CNP). Material and Method: A total of 35 participants aged 65 and over, 17 older people with a diagnosis of CNP (CNP group) and 18 older people without CNP (control group), were included in this cross-sectional study. The Spinal Mouse device was used to measure spinal posture for the positions of vertebral column and spinal mobility for the movements in sagittal and frontal planes for the vertebral column. Handgrip strength was measured with a hand dynamometer. Results: The mean age of the CNP group and the control group were 69.88±4.66 years and 71.50±4.61 years (p>0.05), respectively. There were significant differences in right and left handgrip strength between the CNP group and the control group, respectively (p=0.008, p=0.022). According to the spinal posture values, the mean length of the vertebral column in CNP group was higher than the controls (p=0.028). In addition, the lumbar and pelvic inclination angles were different between the groups in maximum flexion positions (p=0.040 and p=0.027, respectively). According to the spinal mobility values, the mean pelvic inclination angle was lower in the CNP group than the controls from the upright position to the flexion movement (p=0.023). In addition, the lumbar and pelvic inclination angles were lower in the CNP group than the controls from the maximum extension to the maximum flexion movement (p=0.017 and p=0.013, respectively). Conclusion: This study showed that the length of the vertebral column and the grip strength were higher in the older adults with CNP than the controls. According to the spinal posture, the lumbar angle and pelvic inclination angle were lower in the older adults with CNP than the controls. According to the spinal mobility, the pelvic inclination and lumbar angles in the older adults with CNP were lower than the controls.

Medical RecordsVol. 7(2)
Izmir University (TR), Bakırçay Üniversitesi, Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.