Viscoelastic materials evaluated for blast-resistant designs

Abstract Viscoelastic materials have extensive military applications due to their energy absorption capabilities, with the potential to reduce blast energy imposed on buildings, vehicles, and personnel. Based on current literature, limited information is available regarding the mitigation of blast energy related to these uses. The impact of thickness, nanoparticle addition, and layering variation was assessed in this study using commercially available viscoelastic materials in open-air blasts of Composition C4 to determine shock energy mitigation capabilities. Time-pressure waveforms were recorded to identify optimal changes in shock wave characteristics: reduced peak pressure, positive phase duration, and impulse, with increased rise times. Results were analyzed through trend and linear regression analysis to evaluate factors possibly influencing the behavior of the materials. Polyurethane-based materials reduced peak pressures by extending the positive phase duration, whereas silicone rubber maintained a similar duration with reduced peak pressures, suggesting differing energy dissipation mechanisms. Polyurethane was more effective due to its pressure reduction regardless of thickness, enabling thinner layers to be used to achieve similar results. Overall, thinner layers were more efficient, as diminished returns were evident by asymptotic points once reaching a 7-mm thickness. Incorporating graphene nanoplatelets increased energy transfer with peak pressure increases up to 16% in the polyurethane-based samples and impulse increases of 7.5% in the silicone rubber-based samples, making the baseline samples more effective. Layers alternating in material type reduced peak pressures up to 16% relative to baseline samples, with the most reduction occurring in the thicker layers. The alternate layering patterns proved pivotal in the results, those starting with silicone rubber being correlated to increases of 21% in positive phase duration and 6.5% in decay time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shock Waves
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-025-01225-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Viscoelastic materials evaluated for blast-resistant designs

Markus Weber Sutter, A. Douglas, Cody Thomas, Catherine E. Johnson et al.
1 citations
Shock Waves
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.95
article

Viscoelastic materials evaluated for blast-resistant designs

Markus Weber Sutter, A. Douglas, Cody Thomas, Catherine E. Johnson, Fatih Dogan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Viscoelastic materials have extensive military applications due to their energy absorption capabilities, with the potential to reduce blast energy imposed on buildings, vehicles, and personnel. Based on current literature, limited information is available regarding the mitigation of blast energy related to these uses. The impact of thickness, nanoparticle addition, and layering variation was assessed in this study using commercially available viscoelastic materials in open-air blasts of Composition C4 to determine shock energy mitigation capabilities. Time-pressure waveforms were recorded to identify optimal changes in shock wave characteristics: reduced peak pressure, positive phase duration, and impulse, with increased rise times. Results were analyzed through trend and linear regression analysis to evaluate factors possibly influencing the behavior of the materials. Polyurethane-based materials reduced peak pressures by extending the positive phase duration, whereas silicone rubber maintained a similar duration with reduced peak pressures, suggesting differing energy dissipation mechanisms. Polyurethane was more effective due to its pressure reduction regardless of thickness, enabling thinner layers to be used to achieve similar results. Overall, thinner layers were more efficient, as diminished returns were evident by asymptotic points once reaching a 7-mm thickness. Incorporating graphene nanoplatelets increased energy transfer with peak pressure increases up to 16% in the polyurethane-based samples and impulse increases of 7.5% in the silicone rubber-based samples, making the baseline samples more effective. Layers alternating in material type reduced peak pressures up to 16% relative to baseline samples, with the most reduction occurring in the thicker layers. The alternate layering patterns proved pivotal in the results, those starting with silicone rubber being correlated to increases of 21% in positive phase duration and 6.5% in decay time.

Shock WavesVol. 35(5)
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Army Research Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.