Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients

Males have increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis than females, possibly due to poorer immunosurveillance. We tested whether the female survival advantage is lost with immunosuppression by evaluating 17,048 cancer patients (68% male) with a prior solid organ transplant using data from the US Transplant Cancer Match Study and 1,221,914 cancer patients (58% male) from the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We evaluated 13 solid cancers that occur in both sexes. We compared mortality due to cancer in males and females using a male:female hazard ratio (M:F HR) derived from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, diagnosis year, stage, and cancer treatment. Among cancer patients in the general population, males had higher cancer-specific mortality than females for cancers of the lip, stomach, colorectum, anus, liver, lung, skin, brain, and thyroid, with M:F HRs ranging from 1.06 to 1.59. Only colorectal cancer showed an attenuation in the female mortality advantage in transplant recipients (M:F HR<sub>Transplant</sub>: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.03; vs. M:F HR<sub>GenPop</sub>: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.08; P-interaction = 0.007). Among kidney cancer patients, the female mortality advantage was stronger in the transplant population (M:F HR<sub>Transplant</sub>: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.60; M:F HR<sub>GenPop</sub>: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04; P-interaction = 0.003). Overall, we did not find consistent evidence that the female advantage in cancer mortality is weakened among immunosuppressed transplant recipients, suggesting that non-immune factors contribute to the female advantage among cancer patients in the general population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35415
Primary Topic
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients

Sarah S. Jackson, Bożena M Morawski, Eric A. Engels, Ruth M. Pfeiffer et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
article

Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients

Sarah S. Jackson, Bożena M Morawski, Eric A. Engels, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Mei‐Chin Hsieh, Tabassum Z. Insaf, Shuhui Wang, Kelly J. Yu, Erin R. Gardner, Charles F. Lynch
article en

Abstract

Males have increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis than females, possibly due to poorer immunosurveillance. We tested whether the female survival advantage is lost with immunosuppression by evaluating 17,048 cancer patients (68% male) with a prior solid organ transplant using data from the US Transplant Cancer Match Study and 1,221,914 cancer patients (58% male) from the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We evaluated 13 solid cancers that occur in both sexes. We compared mortality due to cancer in males and females using a male:female hazard ratio (M:F HR) derived from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, diagnosis year, stage, and cancer treatment. Among cancer patients in the general population, males had higher cancer-specific mortality than females for cancers of the lip, stomach, colorectum, anus, liver, lung, skin, brain, and thyroid, with M:F HRs ranging from 1.06 to 1.59. Only colorectal cancer showed an attenuation in the female mortality advantage in transplant recipients (M:F HR<sub>Transplant</sub>: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.03; vs. M:F HR<sub>GenPop</sub>: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.08; P-interaction = 0.007). Among kidney cancer patients, the female mortality advantage was stronger in the transplant population (M:F HR<sub>Transplant</sub>: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.60; M:F HR<sub>GenPop</sub>: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04; P-interaction = 0.003). Overall, we did not find consistent evidence that the female advantage in cancer mortality is weakened among immunosuppressed transplant recipients, suggesting that non-immune factors contribute to the female advantage among cancer patients in the general population.

International Journal of CancerVol. 157(3)
University of Iowa (US), New York State Department of Health (US), Virginia Department of Health (US), Texas Department of State Health Services (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.