Transfer of A Sentenced Person Without His/Her Consent (Art. 454 and Art. 456 of the CPC)

Exceptionally, transfers of sentenced persons (prisoners) are carried out without their consent. This person’s consent is not required for his/her surrender to the country of nationality, if achievable through his/her expulsion. Consent of the person is not necessary, since this surrender is actually his/her extradition combined with recognition and enforcement of the sentencing country’s judgment against him/her in the country of nationality. Per argumentum a fortiori, there is no need for consent if the person fled from the sentencing country to the country of nationality. In that case, there might be no extradition, let alone actual transfer of the sentenced person since s/he is already in his/her country. There, only recognition and enforcement of the foreign judgment against him/her may take place. In view thereof, this person’s will is irrelevant. Unlike the previous case involving extradition, this one also does not require any Speciality Principle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
De Jure
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54664/iont6487
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transfer of A Sentenced Person Without His/Her Consent (Art. 454 and Art. 456 of the CPC)

Anton Girginov
De Jure
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Transfer of A Sentenced Person Without His/Her Consent (Art. 454 and Art. 456 of the CPC)

Anton Girginov
article en

Abstract

Exceptionally, transfers of sentenced persons (prisoners) are carried out without their consent. This person’s consent is not required for his/her surrender to the country of nationality, if achievable through his/her expulsion. Consent of the person is not necessary, since this surrender is actually his/her extradition combined with recognition and enforcement of the sentencing country’s judgment against him/her in the country of nationality. Per argumentum a fortiori, there is no need for consent if the person fled from the sentencing country to the country of nationality. In that case, there might be no extradition, let alone actual transfer of the sentenced person since s/he is already in his/her country. There, only recognition and enforcement of the foreign judgment against him/her may take place. In view thereof, this person’s will is irrelevant. Unlike the previous case involving extradition, this one also does not require any Speciality Principle.

De JureVol. 16(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.