Comparing Dry and Wet High-Intensity Magnetic Separation for Iron Removal from Low-Grade Magnesite Ore

This paper investigates the removal of iron impurities from a low-grade Saudi magnesite ore (37.68% MgO and 1.91% Fe2O3). Both wet and dry high-intensity magnetic separation techniques were explored. In dry magnetic separation using an Outotec-induced roll magnetic, the feed size, feed rate, magnetic field, and roll speed were optimized. On the other hand, using a WHIMS laboratory wet high magnetic separator, the studied parameters were slurry flow rate, magnetic field, and pulp density. The results show that a maximum iron removal of 72.32% can be achieved using DHIMS (product with 0.71% Fe2O3 at (-0.212+0.05 mm) feed size, 0.3 kg/min feed rate, 14 KGauss, and a roll speed of 50 rpm. However, the optimal conditions for wet magnetic separation were magnetic field of 14 KGauss, 15 wt.% solid feed, and flow rate of 0.4 L/min, lead to a product that has 0.46% Fe2O3 which mean an iron removal of 84.25%. The product can be used in refractory materials, brake lining, leather treatment, and welding. It is also suitable for chemical, fertilizer, and wastewater treatment, flue gas treatment, and pesticides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Afinidad
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55815/432102
Primary Topic
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Dry and Wet High-Intensity Magnetic Separation for Iron Removal from Low-Grade Magnesite Ore

Hussin A. M. Ahmed, M. Al-Haddad
Afinidad
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
article

Comparing Dry and Wet High-Intensity Magnetic Separation for Iron Removal from Low-Grade Magnesite Ore

Hussin A. M. Ahmed, M. Al-Haddad
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the removal of iron impurities from a low-grade Saudi magnesite ore (37.68% MgO and 1.91% Fe2O3). Both wet and dry high-intensity magnetic separation techniques were explored. In dry magnetic separation using an Outotec-induced roll magnetic, the feed size, feed rate, magnetic field, and roll speed were optimized. On the other hand, using a WHIMS laboratory wet high magnetic separator, the studied parameters were slurry flow rate, magnetic field, and pulp density. The results show that a maximum iron removal of 72.32% can be achieved using DHIMS (product with 0.71% Fe2O3 at (-0.212+0.05 mm) feed size, 0.3 kg/min feed rate, 14 KGauss, and a roll speed of 50 rpm. However, the optimal conditions for wet magnetic separation were magnetic field of 14 KGauss, 15 wt.% solid feed, and flow rate of 0.4 L/min, lead to a product that has 0.46% Fe2O3 which mean an iron removal of 84.25%. The product can be used in refractory materials, brake lining, leather treatment, and welding. It is also suitable for chemical, fertilizer, and wastewater treatment, flue gas treatment, and pesticides.

AfinidadVol. 82(605)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.