Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Law Students: Crutch, Craft, or Catalyst?

This symposium article explores the integration of generative AI in legal education, addressing its impact on law practice and the responsibilities of law schools in preparing students for an AI-enabled future.It examines the history of AI development, its current capabilities in the legal field, and the ethical considerations surrounding its use.The article proposes three areas for AI integration in law schools: pedagogy, administration, and scholarship, outlining potential benefits and challenges in each.It also discusses the concerns and solutions associated with teaching AI skills to law students, emphasizing the need to develop critical thinking, collaboration, and practical legal skills alongside AI proficiency.The article concludes by advocating for changes in legal education to prioritize AI skills, suggesting that expectations and standards should evolve to reflect the growing importance of AI in the legal profession.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60095/lmdv2597
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Law Students: Crutch, Craft, or Catalyst?

David Kemp
Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Law Students: Crutch, Craft, or Catalyst?

David Kemp
article en

Abstract

This symposium article explores the integration of generative AI in legal education, addressing its impact on law practice and the responsibilities of law schools in preparing students for an AI-enabled future.It examines the history of AI development, its current capabilities in the legal field, and the ethical considerations surrounding its use.The article proposes three areas for AI integration in law schools: pedagogy, administration, and scholarship, outlining potential benefits and challenges in each.It also discusses the concerns and solutions associated with teaching AI skills to law students, emphasizing the need to develop critical thinking, collaboration, and practical legal skills alongside AI proficiency.The article concludes by advocating for changes in legal education to prioritize AI skills, suggesting that expectations and standards should evolve to reflect the growing importance of AI in the legal profession.

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public PolicyVol. 49(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.