Truth and Democratic Accountability: Considerations for the Public Sphere, Public Leadership and Performance Management

This essay draws on the extensive legacy of political philosophy to examine the relationship between truth and the administration of liberal democracies. The essay includes a discussion of the relationship between truth and the “reason” of classical, small ‘l’ liberalism, the role of science as an institution and a generator of truth claims, and differences between truth and opinions in relation to political discourse. Contemporary challenges with truthfulness in liberal democracies are explored, including the role of postmodernism and the current climate of conspiracy, conflation of truth claims and opinions, and organized lying. The essay looks at the ways that truth and public accountably can be reclaimed in the public sphere, calling for a renewed focus on the ethics of public leadership, and inviting the reconsideration of the narrative functions of performance management systems. The essay concludes with a call for public accountability scholars to consider the basis of truthfulness as a metastandard for democratic accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Performance & Management Review
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2499814
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Truth and Democratic Accountability: Considerations for the Public Sphere, Public Leadership and Performance Management

Christopher Koliba
4 citations
Public Performance & Management Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
14.63
article

Truth and Democratic Accountability: Considerations for the Public Sphere, Public Leadership and Performance Management

Christopher Koliba
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This essay draws on the extensive legacy of political philosophy to examine the relationship between truth and the administration of liberal democracies. The essay includes a discussion of the relationship between truth and the “reason” of classical, small ‘l’ liberalism, the role of science as an institution and a generator of truth claims, and differences between truth and opinions in relation to political discourse. Contemporary challenges with truthfulness in liberal democracies are explored, including the role of postmodernism and the current climate of conspiracy, conflation of truth claims and opinions, and organized lying. The essay looks at the ways that truth and public accountably can be reclaimed in the public sphere, calling for a renewed focus on the ethics of public leadership, and inviting the reconsideration of the narrative functions of performance management systems. The essay concludes with a call for public accountability scholars to consider the basis of truthfulness as a metastandard for democratic accountability.

Public Performance & Management Review
University of Kansas (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Public Policy and Administration Research
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.