From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment

This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (<i>p</i> = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (<i>p</i> = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (<i>p</i> = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (<i>p</i> = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (<i>p</i> < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (<i>p</i> = .002) and C than A (<i>p</i> = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment

Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug, Sascha Ketelhut
2 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
1.37
article

From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment

Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug, Sascha Ketelhut
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (<i>p</i> = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (<i>p</i> = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (<i>p</i> = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (<i>p</i> = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (<i>p</i> < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (<i>p</i> = .002) and C than A (<i>p</i> = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(15)
University of Bern (CH), Zurich University of the Arts (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.