Classification of dinosaur footprints using machine learning

Fossilized dinosaur footprints enable us to study the behavior of individual dinosaurs as well as interactions between dinosaurs of the same or different species. There are two principal groups of three-toed dinosaurs, ornithopods and theropods. Determining if a footprint is from an ornithopod or a theropod is a challenging problem. Based on a data set of over 300 dinosaur footprints we train several machine learning models for classifying footprints as either ornithopods or theropods. The data are provided in the form of 20 landmarks for representing each footprint which are derived from images. Variable selection using logistic forward regression demonstrates that the selected landmarks are at locations that are intuitively expected to be especially informative locations, such as the top or the bottom of a footprint. Most models show good accuracy but the recall of ornithopods, of which fewer samples were contained in the data set, was generally lower than the recall of theropods. The Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) stands out as the model which did best at dealing with the class imbalance. Finally, we investigate which footprints were misclassified by the majority of models. We find that some misclassified samples exhibit features that are characteristic of the other class or have a compromised shape, for example, a middle toe that points to the left or the right rather than straight ahead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2025.2493157
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of dinosaur footprints using machine learning

Ian H. Jarman, Ivo Siekmann, Jens N. Lallensack, Peter Falkingham et al.
2 citations
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
3.18
article

Classification of dinosaur footprints using machine learning

Ian H. Jarman, Ivo Siekmann, Jens N. Lallensack, Peter Falkingham, Michael Jones
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Fossilized dinosaur footprints enable us to study the behavior of individual dinosaurs as well as interactions between dinosaurs of the same or different species. There are two principal groups of three-toed dinosaurs, ornithopods and theropods. Determining if a footprint is from an ornithopod or a theropod is a challenging problem. Based on a data set of over 300 dinosaur footprints we train several machine learning models for classifying footprints as either ornithopods or theropods. The data are provided in the form of 20 landmarks for representing each footprint which are derived from images. Variable selection using logistic forward regression demonstrates that the selected landmarks are at locations that are intuitively expected to be especially informative locations, such as the top or the bottom of a footprint. Most models show good accuracy but the recall of ornithopods, of which fewer samples were contained in the data set, was generally lower than the recall of theropods. The Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) stands out as the model which did best at dealing with the class imbalance. Finally, we investigate which footprints were misclassified by the majority of models. We find that some misclassified samples exhibit features that are characteristic of the other class or have a compromised shape, for example, a middle toe that points to the left or the right rather than straight ahead.

Journal of Vertebrate PaleontologyVol. 44(6)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Department of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics (BY), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
3.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.