Quantitative assessment of fire risk in building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) modules coated with fire retardant materials for enhanced fire resistance performance

With the growing incorporation of building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) into modern architecture, evaluating their fire safety is crucial. This study assesses the fire risk associated with BIPV systems, specifically focusing on PV modules coated with various flame-retardant and fire-resistant materials. Using the cone calorimeter test (CCT), we analyzed fire growth and spread tendencies by examining the heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), and total smoke release (TSR) among other parameters. The results indicate that both flame-retardant (FLRT) and fire-resistant (FRT) coatings effectively mitigate fire risks, with FRT-A coatings demonstrating the highest performance level, thereby enhancing fire safety. Furthermore, to identify quantitative indicators for the impact of fire risk by combustion characteristics, this research sought to answer the questions, “Which risk factors are dangerous? and “How much more dangerous are they?.” The fire test results were quantified using a relative fire risk scoring (RFRS) methodology based on relative evaluation. The fire risk scores for nine characteristics were calculated, ranking them as follows: FRT-A (39.9 points) < FLRT-A (41.5 points) < uncoated (42.2 points). These scores corroborate those calculated based on the fire risk equation. The fire risk associated with FLRT and FRT coatings was analyzed according to their specific properties. In conclusion, this study not only enhances our understanding of BIPV fire characteristics but also enhances the reliability of operations and the safety of designs. It recommends the establishment of standards and codes to integrate effective fire safety measures into PV installations, serving as a foundation for future research aimed at optimizing fire resistance in eco-friendly BIPV technologies. • Fire risk assessed for BIPV modules, both uncoated and coated with fire retardants • Novel fire risk assessment method based on relative fire risk scoring proposed • Effectiveness of fire retardant coatings validated through a cone calorimeter test • FLRT and FRT modules exhibit a lower comprehensive fire risk than uncoated modules • Total risk is ranked as follows: Uncoated-F > Uncoated-B > FLRT-A > FRT-A

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106285
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative assessment of fire risk in building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) modules coated with fire retardant materials for enhanced fire resistance performance

Yong Chan Jung, Heekyung Park, Min Chul Lee, Min Ji Song
4 citations
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Fire dynamics and safety research
5.21
article

Quantitative assessment of fire risk in building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) modules coated with fire retardant materials for enhanced fire resistance performance

Yong Chan Jung, Heekyung Park, Min Chul Lee, Min Ji Song
article en
4 citations

Abstract

With the growing incorporation of building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) into modern architecture, evaluating their fire safety is crucial. This study assesses the fire risk associated with BIPV systems, specifically focusing on PV modules coated with various flame-retardant and fire-resistant materials. Using the cone calorimeter test (CCT), we analyzed fire growth and spread tendencies by examining the heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), and total smoke release (TSR) among other parameters. The results indicate that both flame-retardant (FLRT) and fire-resistant (FRT) coatings effectively mitigate fire risks, with FRT-A coatings demonstrating the highest performance level, thereby enhancing fire safety. Furthermore, to identify quantitative indicators for the impact of fire risk by combustion characteristics, this research sought to answer the questions, “Which risk factors are dangerous? and “How much more dangerous are they?.” The fire test results were quantified using a relative fire risk scoring (RFRS) methodology based on relative evaluation. The fire risk scores for nine characteristics were calculated, ranking them as follows: FRT-A (39.9 points) < FLRT-A (41.5 points) < uncoated (42.2 points). These scores corroborate those calculated based on the fire risk equation. The fire risk associated with FLRT and FRT coatings was analyzed according to their specific properties. In conclusion, this study not only enhances our understanding of BIPV fire characteristics but also enhances the reliability of operations and the safety of designs. It recommends the establishment of standards and codes to integrate effective fire safety measures into PV installations, serving as a foundation for future research aimed at optimizing fire resistance in eco-friendly BIPV technologies. • Fire risk assessed for BIPV modules, both uncoated and coated with fire retardants • Novel fire risk assessment method based on relative fire risk scoring proposed • Effectiveness of fire retardant coatings validated through a cone calorimeter test • FLRT and FRT modules exhibit a lower comprehensive fire risk than uncoated modules • Total risk is ranked as follows: Uncoated-F > Uncoated-B > FLRT-A > FRT-A

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 72
Electric Power Research Institute (US), Incheon National University (KR), Chungnam National University (KR), Korea Electric Power Corporation (South Korea) (KR)
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea Electric Power Corporation, Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fire dynamics and safety research
5.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.