Impact of Task Complexity on Lexical Complexity in CET4 Writing Insights from LCA Measurement Dimensions

To investigate how task complexity cognitive factors influence the lexical complexity in essay writing, this study was guided by Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis (CH) and Skehan’s Limited Attentional Capacity Model (LACM), and examined the effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in undergraduates’ essay writing. Using Lu’s Lexical Complexity Analyser (2010, 2012), the study analysed essays written by 60 undergraduates across 25 dimensions of lexical complexity, following the SSARC grouping method by Robinson and Gilabert (2007). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test evaluated the relationship between pre-existing standardised writing scores (PS) and the essay outputs under the experimental condition (QM), focusing on lexical density, lexical sophistication, and lexical variation dimensions. Findings indicate that verb sophistication and the Uber index are significantly associated with higher proficiency, supporting Robinson’s CH, which links cognitive resource allocation in complex tasks to improved language proficiency. Noun variation also emerged as significant, aligning with recent studies emphasising lexical diversity in writing. However, measurements like lexical density and type/token ratio showed no significant differences, suggesting a limited role. The study highlights the importance of sophisticated lexical use; however, it also acknowledges that cognitive resource limitations, as posited by Skehan’s LACM, may constrain the deployment of more complex lexical structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Teaching Research Quarterly
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.47.13
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Task Complexity on Lexical Complexity in CET4 Writing Insights from LCA Measurement Dimensions

Mohammad Musab Azmat Ali, Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi, Changlin Li
Language Teaching Research Quarterly
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Impact of Task Complexity on Lexical Complexity in CET4 Writing Insights from LCA Measurement Dimensions

Mohammad Musab Azmat Ali, Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi, Changlin Li
article en

Abstract

To investigate how task complexity cognitive factors influence the lexical complexity in essay writing, this study was guided by Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis (CH) and Skehan’s Limited Attentional Capacity Model (LACM), and examined the effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in undergraduates’ essay writing. Using Lu’s Lexical Complexity Analyser (2010, 2012), the study analysed essays written by 60 undergraduates across 25 dimensions of lexical complexity, following the SSARC grouping method by Robinson and Gilabert (2007). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test evaluated the relationship between pre-existing standardised writing scores (PS) and the essay outputs under the experimental condition (QM), focusing on lexical density, lexical sophistication, and lexical variation dimensions. Findings indicate that verb sophistication and the Uber index are significantly associated with higher proficiency, supporting Robinson’s CH, which links cognitive resource allocation in complex tasks to improved language proficiency. Noun variation also emerged as significant, aligning with recent studies emphasising lexical diversity in writing. However, measurements like lexical density and type/token ratio showed no significant differences, suggesting a limited role. The study highlights the importance of sophisticated lexical use; however, it also acknowledges that cognitive resource limitations, as posited by Skehan’s LACM, may constrain the deployment of more complex lexical structures.

Language Teaching Research QuarterlyVol. 47
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.