Dave: A Decentralized, Secure, and Lively Fraud-Proof Algorithm

In this article, we introduce a new fraud-proof algorithm that offers an excellent balance between decentralization, security, and liveness. The resources that must be mobilized by an honest participant to defeat an adversary grow logarithmically relative to the adversary’s ultimate losses. Therefore, there is no need to introduce high bonds to prevent an adversary from creating too many Sybils. This design ensures broad accessibility, freeing participants from the need to pool resources among themselves to engage with the protocol. Additionally, the maximum delay to finalization grows only logarithmically with total adversarial expenditure. Moreover, the factor multiplying the logarithm is the smallest to date. In summary, the entire dispute completes within at most two to five challenge periods; the only way to break consensus is to censor the honest party for more than one challenge period, and the costs of engaging in the dispute are minimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3734698
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dave: A Decentralized, Secure, and Lively Fraud-Proof Algorithm

Diego Nehab, Augusto Teixeira, Gabriel Coutinho de Paula
1 citations
Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice
Cryptography and Data Security
2.48
article

Dave: A Decentralized, Secure, and Lively Fraud-Proof Algorithm

Diego Nehab, Augusto Teixeira, Gabriel Coutinho de Paula
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, we introduce a new fraud-proof algorithm that offers an excellent balance between decentralization, security, and liveness. The resources that must be mobilized by an honest participant to defeat an adversary grow logarithmically relative to the adversary’s ultimate losses. Therefore, there is no need to introduce high bonds to prevent an adversary from creating too many Sybils. This design ensures broad accessibility, freeing participants from the need to pool resources among themselves to engage with the protocol. Additionally, the maximum delay to finalization grows only logarithmically with total adversarial expenditure. Moreover, the factor multiplying the logarithm is the smallest to date. In summary, the entire dispute completes within at most two to five challenge periods; the only way to break consensus is to censor the honest party for more than one challenge period, and the costs of engaging in the dispute are minimal.

Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and PracticeVol. 5(2)
Temasek Defence Systems Institute (SG), Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cryptography and Data Security
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dave: A Decentralized, Secure, and Lively Fraud-Proof Algorithm — Diego Nehab, Augusto Teixeira, et al. · Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS